ArticlePublic health in practice (Oxford, England)2025
Healthcare professionals' perspectives on the implementation and purposefulness of a new alcohol recovery Navigator role in the North East of England - preliminary qualitative findings.
Article in Public health in practice (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to explore clinicians' perspectives in a single acute hospital regarding the introduction and perceived impact of an Alcohol Recovery Navigator role. The role was implemented within a hospital setting in North-East England to improve uptake of treatment in the community post-discharge and thereby help to reduce alcohol-related repeat admissions. Study design: A qualitative study was conducted. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with hospital clinicians (n = 8) recruited via purposive and snowball sampling. Interviews were transcribed verbatim, analysed using thematic analysis, with themes subsequently mapped onto Normalisation Process Theory constructs: coherence, cognitive participation, collective action, and reflexive monitoring. Results: Participants reported high levels of knowledge and understanding (coherence) of the Alcohol Recovery Navigator role and valued having this service as part of patients' recovery pathway. Staff appeared committed to engaging with the role (cognitive participation), which was perceived to have aided implementation and embedding of the role into patient care pathways. Participants were able to make the role work (collective action) by building relationships with hospital staff and patients to improve continuity of care. Staff appraisal (reflexive monitoring) observed increased engagement from patients with Navigators and perceived that the role contributed to patients making changes towards better health. Conclusion: Participants' perspectives support the continued provision of the Alcohol Recovery Navigator role. Implementation was viewed to have been successful, with Navigators imperative in bridging the gap between hospital and community care. Future research is required to assess the effectiveness of the wider programme.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.