ArticleCureus2025
Giant Retroperitoneal Mass During Pregnancy With an Unexpected Diagnosis: Ovarian Cyst or Something Else?
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Abdominopelvic hydatid disease during pregnancy: a systematic review of the literature.Frontiers in global women's health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Abdominal masses during pregnancy are uncommon and challenging to diagnose. Anatomical changes and imaging limitations often complicate evaluation. We present the case of a 30-year-old woman at 30 weeks of gestation who was admitted with progressive abdominal distension and discomfort. Initial ultrasound suggested a large ovarian cyst, but further imaging revealed a giant retroperitoneal mass. An exploratory laparotomy identified a cystic lesion over 25 cm in size containing approximately nine liters of citrine fluid. Partial resection was performed with preservation of maternal stability, and histopathology confirmed a benign suprarenal hydatid cyst. Postoperative recovery was favorable, and the pregnancy progressed without complications. At 39 weeks of gestation, the patient underwent cesarean section and delivered a healthy neonate. Both mother and child remained stable and were discharged in good condition. This case illustrates the importance of considering retroperitoneal pathology in the differential diagnosis of abdominal masses during pregnancy. Hydatid disease, although rare, should be considered in patients from endemic regions, particularly when imaging findings are atypical. Surgical management during pregnancy, while complex, can be safe and effective when conducted in an experienced, multidisciplinary setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.