Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41089082›Full record

ArticlePRiMER (Leawood, Kan.)2025

Best Practices for Advising Students for the NRMP Match in Family Medicine.

Joel J Heidelbaugh, Carolyn Gilbertson, Jacob Prunuske

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Joel J HeidelbaughDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI.
Carolyn GilbertsonUniversity of South Dakota Sanford School of Medicine, Sioux Falls, SD.
Jacob PrunuskeUniversity of South Dakota Sanford School of Medicine, Sioux Falls, SD.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Faculty career advisors (FCAs) are crucial in guiding medical students toward successful National Resident Matching Program outcomes in family medicine. Our specialty is experiencing an evolving landscape, characterized by an increase in postgraduate year-1 positions, shifts in applicant demographics, rising application numbers, and the recent implementation of program signaling and geographic preference setting. This professional development perspective offers FCAs strategies to navigate these complexities beyond

Identifiers

PMID41089082
PMCPMC12517391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.