Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41089020›Full record

ArticlePsychiatry investigation2025

Predictive Validity and Cutoff Scores of the Revised Suicide Crisis Inventory in Korean Adults: A One-Year Follow-Up Study.

Gangmin Ma, Sungeun You

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychiatry investigation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gangmin MaDepartment of Psychology, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, Republic of Korea.
Sungeun YouDepartment of Psychology, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, Republic of Korea.

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea NRF2020S1A5A2A03044181
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aimed to examine the predictive validity of the revised Suicide Crisis Inventory (SCI-2) and determine its optimal cutoff score.

methodsData from 662 community adults participating in a one-year follow-up study were analyzed. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was conducted to examine whether the SCI-2 could predict suicide attempts and ideation with intent at the follow-up and to determine the optimal cutoff score for identifying individuals at high risk for suicide.

resultsThe SCI-2 demonstrated adequate predictive validity for suicide attempts and ideation with intent at the one-year follow-up. Based on Youden's index and Runeson et al.'s criteria, a cutoff score of 102 was proposed as the threshold for high-risk groups.

conclusionThe SCI-2, a measure of Suicide Crisis Syndrome, demonstrated predictive validity using longitudinal data. It is effective in identifying high-risk individuals in a community population. These findings highlight the SCI-2 as a valuable tool for early suicide risk detection and prevention.

Indexed as

Risk assessmentSuicideSuicide attemptSuicide Crisis Inventory-2

Identifiers

PMID41089020
PMCPMC12646712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.