Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41088913›Full record

ArticleThe International journal of eating disorders2026

A Non-Randomized Comparison of the Addition of New Maudsley Model Workshops for Parents of Adult Women Receiving Multidisciplinary Care for Anorexia Nervosa.

Cristiano Dani, Eleonora Rossi, Emanuele Cassioli, Valentina Zofia Cordasco, Alice Roscioli, Giulia Selvi, Livio Tarchi, Luca Zompa, Sandra Moretti, Maria Rita Troiani and 4 more

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The International journal of eating disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Participation in the New Maudsley Model Workshops is Associated With Reductions in Caregiver Burden in Eating Disorders.European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Cristiano DaniDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2705-5453
Eleonora RossiDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4755-3879
Emanuele CassioliDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3623-7096
Valentina Zofia CordascoDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-9713-3273
Alice RoscioliDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-3788-4413
Giulia SelviDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9613-0904
Livio TarchiDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9931-5621
Luca ZompaDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-2327-0732
Sandra MorettiDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4020-641X
Maria Rita TroianiUFS Eating Disorders ASL Toscana Centro, Florence, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2923-2895
Stefano LucarelliUFS Eating Disorders ASL Toscana Centro, Florence, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-3116-5812
Valentina CardiDepartment of General Psychology, University of Padova, Padua, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7763-7099
Valdo RiccaDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9291-2124
Giovanni CastelliniDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1265-491X

Funding

Ministero dell'Università e della Ricerca PE0000006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe impact of the add-on of New Maudsley Model (NMM) training workshops for carers of individuals with eating disorders (EDs) on clinical outcomes in adults with anorexia nervosa (AN) undergoing enhanced cognitive behavior therapy (CBT-E) remains unexplored. The outcomes of females with AN aged 18 and 35 years, treated with CBT-E, were compared between those whose parents agreed to attend NMM workshops and those whose parents declined participation.

methodPsychopathology was assessed up to 1-year follow-up. Baseline differences were analyzed using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), while longitudinal changes were evaluated with generalized additive mixed models (GAMMs).

resultsAt admission, individuals in the NMM group had higher levels of ED psychopathology, body uneasiness, and alexithymia. At 1-year follow-up, both groups improved significantly, and between-group comparisons revealed significant effect sizes in favor of the NMM group. DISCUSSION: Parental participation in NMM workshops was associated with more favorable treatment outcomes in adults with AN undergoing CBT-E. These findings suggest the potential relevance of integrating family participation into adult AN treatment.

Indexed as

Anorexia NervosaCognitive Behavioral TherapyParentsAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansTreatment OutcomeYoung Adultanorexia nervosacarersNew Maudsley Modeloutcomeparents

Identifiers

PMID41088913
PMCPMC12773670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.