ArticleNeurodegenerative disease management2026
Exploring the mid-term impact of telemonitoring in Parkinson's disease: insights from adoption into clinical practice.
Article in Neurodegenerative disease management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRoutine clinical evaluations offer limited insight into daily variability and disease progression in Parkinson's disease (PD). While wearable devices are increasingly used to improve patient monitoring, evidence of their effectiveness remains scarce.
objectiveTo assess the efficacy of integrating a telemonitoring system into standard clinical procedures, highlighting its role in enabling efficient, patient-centered treatment adjustments.
methodsThirty-five PD patients were monitored for 6 months using a telemonitoring device alongside standard care. Disease progression was assessed via MDS-UPDRS part III (UPDRS-p3) and device-reported outcomes (dUPDRS) at baseline and follow-up. Physicians provided feedback on telemedicine utility.
resultsUPDRS-p3 scores improved by 1.9-5.63 points. Changes in UPDRS-p3 strongly correlated with dUPDRS (
conclusionTelemonitoring supported clinical decisions, detected subtle symptom changes, and offered valuable insights for improving motor symptoms and patient management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.