Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41088846›Full record

ReviewInsect science2026

Selection, counterselection, and conditional gene expression for genetic biocontrol of insects.

Melanie Hempel, Zhijian Tu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Insect science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Melanie HempelDepartment of Biochemistry and the Fralin Life Sciences Institute, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia.
Zhijian TuDepartment of Biochemistry and the Fralin Life Sciences Institute, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4227-3819

Funding

International Atomic Energy AgencyNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases AI157491National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases AI179056
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic biocontrol methods are species-specific ways to suppress or modify pest insect populations to mitigate their economic or health impact. Successful genetic biocontrol often requires mass releases of only males of the target species. Reliable and cost-effective sex separation is a major bottleneck to the implementation of genetic biocontrol of many important species of agricultural and medical importance. Conditional selection is critical to resolving this major challenge. A diverse array of tools, such as the temperature-sensitive systems, the Gal4/UAS, QF/QUAS, and Tet-on/off bipartite systems, and the photoactivatable systems, have been established in various insect species. In this review, we focus on how various means of conditional expression have been used to achieve sex separation. We also describe other means of selection and counterselection to achieve sex separation without conditional gene expression. By providing examples across many species and discussing the strengths and weaknesses of each method, we hope to facilitate the design and application of conditional systems to improve genetic biocontrol of insect pests.

Indexed as

Gene ExpressionInsectaPest Control, BiologicalSelection, GeneticAnimalsMaleconditional gene expressiongenetic biocontrolsex chromosomesex determinationsex separationsterile insect technique (SIT)

Identifiers

PMID41088846
PMCPMC13087862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.