Observational studyMedicine2025
Hematological safety of hyperbaric oxygen therapy in oncology: Stratified analysis by chemotherapy and herbal medicine use.
Observational study in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) is increasingly utilized as an adjunctive treatment in oncology; however, data on its hematological safety (particularly when combined with chemotherapy or traditional herbal therapies) remain limited. We retrospectively analyzed electronic medical records of adults with malignant neoplasms who received HBOT at Cha Ilsan Medical Center from July 1, 2022 to December 31, 2024. Safety was assessed via treatment-emergent adverse events graded by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events and pre-post comparisons of 37 laboratory parameters. Subgroup analyses were stratified by chemotherapy and herbal therapy (traditional Korean medicine) exposure. Covariate-adjusted linear regression models were used to identify independent predictors of laboratory changes after false-discovery-rate correction. Among 259 patients undergoing 2692 HBOT sessions, 2 mild treatment-emergent adverse events occurred (0.07%); no serious or life-threatening events were observed. In 207 patients with paired laboratories, most hematologic and biochemical parameters were stable. Platelet count declined modestly (-16 × 103 µL-1; false-discovery-rate P < .001) and plateletcrit decreased (-0.01%; P < .001), with cohort means remaining within reference intervals. In the paired-laboratory cohort, chemotherapy exposure was 108 vs 99 unexposed, and herbal therapy (traditional Korean medicine) exposure was 132 vs 75 unexposed; exposures were not mutually exclusive. Subgroup analyses showed no clinically meaningful hematologic differences between exposed and unexposed groups. In multivariable linear models, chemotherapy was independently associated with lower white blood cell and neutrophil counts, and herbal therapy with a minor reduction in eosinophils; neither therapy was associated with platelet changes. Low-pressure HBOT demonstrates a favorable hematological safety profile in cancer patients, even when administered alongside chemotherapy or herbal therapies. These findings support the safe integration of HBOT into multimodal cancer care, although prospective multicenter trials are warranted to confirm long-term safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.