ArticleMedical education2026
Scaffolding during surgical procedures: Guidance with baby steps or giant leaps?
Article in Medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Scaffolding during surgical procedures: Guidance with baby steps or giant leaps?Medical education · 2026Article
- The dynamics of dialogue: Social interaction, language and culture in intraoperative teaching and learning.Medical education · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionScaffolding refers to the dynamic support teachers provide to help learners complete tasks they cannot yet do independently. This is often done by breaking tasks into smaller, manageable steps and adjusting the support based on the learner's performance. In the operating room (OR), attending surgeons apply scaffolding to guide residents in performing tasks that they are not yet able to do on their own. However, the OR poses a unique challenge: attending surgeons must balance resident learning with patient safety, and procedures consist of multiple tasks for which the learner's expertise varies. Little is known about how surgeons determine and adjust the appropriate level of support during procedures. This study aims to explore how attending surgeons scaffold residents' learning throughout surgical procedures and the strategies they use to adjust their support on a moment-to-moment basis.
methodsWe conducted a qualitative analysis of 34 instances of step-by-step coaching from transcripts of 16 surgical procedures in which residents performed surgeries under the supervision of an attending surgeon. We used conversation analysis to examine scaffolding in the OR and identify the contexts in which it occurs.
resultsWe found that attending surgeons break down procedures into small steps to guide residents. We identified four components that attendings use, which together form the basic grammar of intraoperative scaffolding. These components are: instructing the resident what the next step is, instructing the resident how to perform the next step, providing an explanation about the step and evaluating the performed step. We described scaffolding as baseline supervision and examined two contexts in which attendings reduce step size: when introducing a new technique and in response to suboptimal task performance. DISCUSSION: The findings highlight the underlying structure of scaffolding in the OR, with attending surgeons navigating when to intervene and when to allow greater autonomy. Understanding how attendings adjust their support can improve alignment with residents' learning needs and foster discussions about shared educational goals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.