ArticleBMC nutrition2025
Nutritional education interventions on the components of metabolic syndrome in the North-Western Bangladeshi adults.
Article in BMC nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evaluation of nutritional interventions and their impact on metabolic syndrome risk markers in older adults.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a cluster of metabolic abnormalities that includes central obesity, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and disturbed glucose metabolism. The main objective was to explore the effects of nutritional interventions on participants with MetS. The quasi-experimental design was carried out on 500 Bangladeshi adults (30 to 69 years; both males and females) who provided informed consent. Modified NCEP ATP III criteria for Asians were used to diagnose the subjects. This study revealed that the overall percentages of men and women with MetS were 59.6% and 59.1%, respectively. The study suggested a 2.69 cm reduction (p < 0.05) in waist circumference in females after 4 months of in-depth nutritional counseling and a 0.24 cm reduction after 4 months of single-intervention nutritional counseling. Similarly, a 2.64 cm reduction (p > 0.05) in males after 4 months of in-depth nutritional counseling and a 1.57 cm increase after a single intervention of nutritional counseling were found to be significant (p < 0.05). A 1.08 mmol/L decrease in FBG was found after in-depth nutritional counseling for 4 months, while no significant difference was detected after a single intervention. A 9.37 mg/dl increase in HDL-C was found (p < 0.05) for females, but for males, the levels of HDL-C remained nearly the same in both intervention groups. A reduction in the MetS proportion was found in the intervention groups (p < 0.05). The loads of MetS components 3, 4, and 5 were 44-23.5%, 47.1-11.8%, and 8.8-5.9% (p > 0.05), respectively, in the in-depth intervention group, whereas in the single intervention group, these were 50.0-32.3%, 41.9-35.5%, and 9.7-22.6%, respectively. Thus, community-based in-depth nutritional counseling reduced the proportion of individuals with MetS and significantly improved several metabolic parameters in Bangladeshi adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.