ArticleAlzheimer's research & therapy2025
Genetic testing of common and rare variants in dementia patients from a memory clinic : Dementia-related genetic testing in memory clinic.
Article in Alzheimer's research & therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMany types of dementia have high heritability, which creates opportunities for DNA diagnostics. Clinicians sporadically test for causal genetic variants. However, in addition to causal genetic mutations, an increasing number of both common and rare risk factors are being identified, especially for Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Here, we describe and evaluate diagnostic performance of combining genetic risk factors for AD to assist memory clinic clinicians.
methodsA retrospective analysis of 998 consecutive patients (mean age 62.1, 40.3% females, 63.3% dementia) was conducted over 2.5 years in a Dutch memory clinic. The patients underwent a complete genetic risk assessment, including whole-exome sequencing and array genotyping. We examined known pathogenic genetic variants for all dementia types and their correlation with clinical diagnoses. We evaluated a combined genetic score (GS) based on all genetic risk factors for AD - namely APOE genotypes, candidate risk rare variants in 11 genes, and a polygenic risk score (PRS) based on 82 common variants. Then, we analyzed the discriminatory characteristics of the GS.
resultsCausal pathogenic variants were rare, present in 3.4% of individuals, but genetic testing would have altered the diagnosis in over half of the carriers. Candidate rare risk variants were more common, identified in 31.6% of patients. Both APOE genotypes and the PRS were independently associated with AD, and gene-specific interaction was found between TREM2 and AD-PRS (β = -1.16, p = 0.015). Patients with a high GS were 7 times more likely receive an AD diagnosis compared to those with a low GS (p = 2.5E-07).
conclusionOverall, this study highlights the potential of integrating genetic risk factors into clinical practice to enhance AD diagnosis, though the improvement in diagnostic accuracy was moderate. The findings underscore the importance of genetic testing in diagnosis while also recognizing its limitations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.