Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41088452›Full record

ReviewKnee surgery & related research2025

Artificial intelligence in total knee arthroplasty: clinical applications and implications.

Kyeong Baek Kim, Gi Beom Kim, Jun-Ho Kim, Sang-Min Lee

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Knee surgery & related research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kyeong Baek KimDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Research Institute for Convergence of Biomedical Science and Technology, 20, Geumo-ro, Mulgeum-eup, Yangsan-si, Gyeongsangnam-do, Yangsan, Republic of Korea.
Gi Beom KimDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Yeungnam University Medical Center, Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.
Jun-Ho KimDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital. Seoul, Anyang, Republic of Korea.
Sang-Min LeeDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Research Institute for Convergence of Biomedical Science and Technology, 20, Geumo-ro, Mulgeum-eup, Yangsan-si, Gyeongsangnam-do, Yangsan, Republic of Korea. dh62121@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7331-9539

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundArtificial intelligence (AI), including machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL), is increasingly being integrated into total knee arthroplasty (TKA) to improve accuracy, efficiency, and personalized care. These technologies enable the analysis of large, complex datasets to support evidence-based clinical decision-making across all phases of the surgical process. MAIN BODY: AI has demonstrated utility in multiple stages of TKA. In patient selection, ML algorithms can predict postoperative complications such as transfusion needs with high accuracy (AUC up to 0.842). For preoperative planning, DL techniques facilitate 3D anatomical reconstruction and implant size prediction, with some models achieving over 90% accuracy for exact component sizing, significantly outperforming traditional 2D templating. Intraoperatively, AI-assisted robotic systems and sensor technologies offer real-time feedback on alignment and soft tissue balancing. Postoperatively, AI-integrated wearable devices and mobile applications enable continuous monitoring and tailored rehabilitation; in some randomized trials, these tools have been associated with a statistically significant reduction in hospital readmission rates. Despite these advances, significant challenges remain, including algorithmic bias, a lack of model generalizability and explainability, and unresolved ethical and regulatory hurdles that present formidable barriers to widespread clinical implementation.

conclusionsAI has the potential to significantly reshape TKA by enabling more precise, data-driven, and patient-centered care. However, its promise is contingent on overcoming critical limitations. Broader implementation requires robust multicenter validation to ensure model reliability, the development of explainable algorithms to build clinical trust, and a commitment to responsible innovation. With continued progress, AI can serve as a powerful complementary tool to augment surgical expertise and enhance patient outcomes in orthopedic surgery.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceAugmented realityDeep learningMachine learningOrthopedicTotal knee arthroplastyVirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID41088452
PMCPMC12522226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.