ReviewKnee surgery & related research2025
Artificial intelligence in total knee arthroplasty: clinical applications and implications.
Review in Knee surgery & related research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Digital Transformation in Orthopedics: Can India Leapfrog with Artificial Intelligence, Augmented Reality, and Robotics?Journal of orthopaedic case reports · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Arthroplasty: A Comprehensive Structured Critical Review and Descriptive Evidence Map of Validation, Uncertainty, and Workflow Integration.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence Applications in Implant Positioning, Dislocation Risk Prediction, and Surgical Indications in Orthopaedic Surgery.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- CT-based 3D planning-supported stem-free screw-cement augmentation versus 2D radiograph-planned short-stem reconstruction for AORI type I-II medial tibial defects in TKA: a two-year retrospective study.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Article
- Surgeon decision-making and implant selection in primary total knee arthroplasty: association of training, experience, and robotic-assisted surgical innovation with implant selection.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundArtificial intelligence (AI), including machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL), is increasingly being integrated into total knee arthroplasty (TKA) to improve accuracy, efficiency, and personalized care. These technologies enable the analysis of large, complex datasets to support evidence-based clinical decision-making across all phases of the surgical process. MAIN BODY: AI has demonstrated utility in multiple stages of TKA. In patient selection, ML algorithms can predict postoperative complications such as transfusion needs with high accuracy (AUC up to 0.842). For preoperative planning, DL techniques facilitate 3D anatomical reconstruction and implant size prediction, with some models achieving over 90% accuracy for exact component sizing, significantly outperforming traditional 2D templating. Intraoperatively, AI-assisted robotic systems and sensor technologies offer real-time feedback on alignment and soft tissue balancing. Postoperatively, AI-integrated wearable devices and mobile applications enable continuous monitoring and tailored rehabilitation; in some randomized trials, these tools have been associated with a statistically significant reduction in hospital readmission rates. Despite these advances, significant challenges remain, including algorithmic bias, a lack of model generalizability and explainability, and unresolved ethical and regulatory hurdles that present formidable barriers to widespread clinical implementation.
conclusionsAI has the potential to significantly reshape TKA by enabling more precise, data-driven, and patient-centered care. However, its promise is contingent on overcoming critical limitations. Broader implementation requires robust multicenter validation to ensure model reliability, the development of explainable algorithms to build clinical trust, and a commitment to responsible innovation. With continued progress, AI can serve as a powerful complementary tool to augment surgical expertise and enhance patient outcomes in orthopedic surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.