ArticleAntimicrobial resistance and infection control2025
Parental involvement in infection prevention and control in low- and middle-income country neonatal units: a scoping review.
Article in Antimicrobial resistance and infection control, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo review the literature on caregiver involvement in infection prevention and control in low- and middle-income country (LMIC) neonatal units (NNUs).
introductionThere is a high burden and mortality of neonatal infections globally, with most of the burden falling on LMIC. Healthcare-associated infections (HCAIs) are a particular challenge, with neonatal sepsis being one of the most common HCAIs. It is urgent to prevent infections, as both identification and treatment of neonatal sepsis are increasingly difficult in these contexts. Parents are consistently present on NNUs but their involvement in infection prevention and control (IPC) has been underexplored. INCLUSION CRITERIA: Included studies were carried out in LMIC NNUs and reported on caregivers' involvement in design, implementation or experience of IPC interventions.
methodsFive databases were searched in four languages and were screened by two authors. Reference searching was carried out of included papers. Data were analysed by each sub-question; caregiver involvement in intervention design (descriptive analysis), caregiver involvement in IPC delivery (quantitative analysis) and caregiver experience of hygiene and care (thematic analysis).
results38 studies were included. Caregiver involvement in IPC design was limited, with examples from four papers. 30 papers contained information about caregiver delivery of IPC interventions. Most activities were related to being educated on IPC, carrying out core IPC activities or providing a specific aspect of an intervention (most frequently Kangaroo Mother Care). 10 papers discussed caregiver experience of NNU hygiene including ethnographic accounts from Ghana, Malawi, Mexico, India and Brazil. Across all contexts hierarchical social structures and challenging communication between healthcare professionals and families was a barrier to effective IPC within NNUs. Families showed a good understanding of core IPC practices and an awareness of contextual challenges of IPC.
conclusionCaregiver involvement in IPC is limited to date. However, interventions such as Kangaroo Mother Care indicate the benefits that can be achieved. Hierarchical structures and communication challenges between healthcare professionals and families are a barrier to inclusion at present and must be addressed in any designed intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.