ArticleThe international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity2025
Normative values for the physical activity scale for the elderly in community-dwelling men and women 45 to 85 years old: an analysis from the CLSA.
Article in The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Association of blood pressure with knee pain progression over 4 years in middle-aged and elderly individuals with or at risks for osteoarthritis: data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative.Clinical rheumatology · 2026Article
- Domain-Specific Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior in Older Adults With Mobility Disability Risk Residing in a Continuing Care Retirement Community: A Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of aging research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMonitoring and improving physical activity levels is essential for promoting healthy aging. The objective of this study was to create age-specific normative values for the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE) among community-dwelling women and men aged 45-85 years old.
methods36,701 participants (47% female) aged 45-85 years old, free of any mobility limitation or activities of daily living disability from the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA) were included. Best fitting models were identified using Generalized Akaike Information Criteria values and cross-validation. Seasonal differences for males and females were also explored.
resultsSeparate models for males and females are presented, providing a range of percentile values (5-95%) in charts and tables. Total PASE scores were highest in 45-year-olds and decreased with age. Seasonal differences were not substantial or consistent at the population level.
conclusionsThe age- and sex- specific normative values provided can improve the interpretability of PASE scores among middle-aged and older adults. In addition to PA guideline cut-offs, normative values provide further information for monitoring physical activity by allowing for more personalized observations that account for healthy variation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.