Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41088397›Full record

ArticleJournal of ovarian research2025

Ovarian reserve and stimulation response before chemotherapy treatment in breast cancer patients undergoing fertility preservation: a historical cohort study.

Nadia Jahangiri, Firouzeh Ghaffari, Maryam Hafezi, Bita Ebrahimi, Samira Vesali, Asiie Olfatbakhsh, Sahar Hosseini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of ovarian research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nadia JahangiriDepartment of Endocrinology and Female Infertility, Reproductive Biomedicine Research Centre, Royan Institute for Reproductive Biomedicine, ACECR, Tehran, Iran.
Firouzeh GhaffariDepartment of Endocrinology and Female Infertility, Reproductive Biomedicine Research Centre, Royan Institute for Reproductive Biomedicine, ACECR, Tehran, Iran. ghaffari@royaninstitute.org.
Maryam HafeziDepartment of Endocrinology and Female Infertility, Reproductive Biomedicine Research Centre, Royan Institute for Reproductive Biomedicine, ACECR, Tehran, Iran.
Bita EbrahimiDepartment of Embryology, Reproductive Biomedicine Research Centre, Royan Institute for Reproductive Biomedicine, ACECR, Tehran, Iran.
Samira VesaliDepartment of Basic and Population Based Studies in NCD, Reproductive Epidemiology Research Center, Royan Institute, ACECR, Tehran, Iran.
Asiie OlfatbakhshBreast Cancer Research Center, Motamed Cancer Institute, ACECR, Tehran, Iran.
Sahar HosseiniDepartment of Endocrinology and Female Infertility, Reproductive Biomedicine Research Centre, Royan Institute for Reproductive Biomedicine, ACECR, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFertility preservation is an important aspect of care for breast cancer patients. This study was designed to compare the ovarian function including ovarian reserve and ovarian stimulation response in breast cancer patients undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) for fertility preservation before chemotherapy, and oocyte donors as healthy women.

methodsThis historical cohort study enrolled 78 breast cancer patients who underwent COS for fertility preservation between April 2014 and March 2022 at the Infertility Center of Royan Institute, Tehran, Iran. Sixty-six healthy oocyte donors were included as a control group during the same time period. The inclusion criteria were female patients aged ≤ 35 years, with confirmed breast cancer with indication of chemotherapy, who were elected for ovarian stimulation before chemotherapy for oocyte retrieval. Women with the diagnosis of poor ovarian response, polycystic ovary syndrome, severe male factor infertility, endometriosis, and those who used oral contraceptives excluded from the study. Main outcome measure was retrieved total number of mature oocytes.

resultsThe mean age was significantly higher and mean body mass index was significantly lower in the breast cancer group than in the oocyte donor group. There were also significant differences between groups in terms of hormonal profiles of luteinizing hormone and anti-mullerian hormone (AMH), gonadotropin starting dose, total dose of gonadotropin used and oocyte maturation rate. Based on the results, there was a significant correlation between Metaphase II and AMH in breast cancer group (r = 626; P < 0.001).

conclusionIt appears that patients with cancer experience diminished ovarian reserve prior to cancer treatment. Further prospective studies with larger sample sizes are recommended. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsFertility PreservationOvarian ReserveOvulation InductionAdultAnti-Mullerian HormoneCohort StudiesFemaleHumansOocyte RetrievalOocytesAnti-Mullerian HormoneBreast cancerFertility preservationOocyte donationOvarian reserveOvarian stimulation

Identifiers

PMID41088397
PMCPMC12522670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.