ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2025
Dollars and dilemmas: lenacapavir's pricing, patents, and the path to affordability.
Article in International journal for equity in health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Long Road to Long-Acting: What Oral PrEP and CAB-LA Teach Us About Scaling Lenacapavir.Drugs · 2026Review
- Optimizing HIV Spending Among Key Populations in Five Latin American and Caribbean Countries: A Mathematical Modelling Study.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2026Article
- Lenacapavir at the Spatiotemporal Limit: Tissue Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacokinetic Tail Dynamics, and the Emergence of Capsid Resistance in Long-Acting HIV Prevention.Clinical pharmacology : advances and applications · 2026Review
- Lenacapavir for HIV Prevention in Africa: Opportunities, Barriers, and Policy Priorities.Journal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS CareReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lenacapavir (Yeztugo), the world's first twice-yearly human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) prevention injection, offers transformative potential but faces a critical challenge: affordability. While its production cost is estimated at just $25 per person annually, projections place its market price at over $25,000 in high-income settings, a 1000-fold markup that could restrict access in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Gilead's licensing agreements with six generic manufacturers, covering 120 low-income countries, mark a step forward. However, upper middle-income countries with significant HIV burdens remain excluded. Four of these excluded countries namely Argentina, Brazil, Mexico, and Peru that hosted the pivotal PURPOSE-2 trial, due to ongoing high HIV transmission among sexual and gender minorities (SGM) and their historical underrepresentation in HIV clinical trials. This raises serious concerns about post-trial access. Moreover, the licensing terms limit flexibility, restrict generic sales outside designated territories, and omit price caps. Without broader coverage or concrete affordability commitments, millions may be left behind. Patent filings and the absence of a Medicines Patent Pool (MPP) partnership also amplify structural barriers. To meet global HIV targets, lenacapavir's rollout must be guided by equity, not monopoly. The coming year will be decisive and will determine whether this breakthrough becomes a global game-changer or another symbol of structural health inequity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.