ArticleBMC rheumatology2025
Text-based messaging to support rheumatoid arthritis care: an analysis of frequency and content of text-messages.
Article in BMC rheumatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveText-based messaging support can improve rheumatoid arthritis (RA) care delivery by connecting patients with healthcare providers (HCPs) in an efficient and convenient manner. However, the nature and appropriateness of patient messaging in this new care model are unknown. The aim of this study was to (1) analyze the frequency and nature of text messages patients sent to their HCPs, and (2) to identify patient characteristics associated with higher texting frequency in a pilot of a text-based messaging (using the WelTel platform) added to usual rheumatology care.
methodsSeventy patients with RA participated in a 6-month pilot. Automated "How are you?" texts were sent monthly, and patients were encouraged to respond according to their current situation. Qualitative content analysis was conducted to thematically categorize and quantify common words and phrases. Regression analysis was conducted to determine if a relationship existed between the number of text messages and age, sex, care complexity (using a validated instrument), number of medications, and burden of comorbidities.
resultsA total of 1404 text messages were sent by patients, with 257 messages requiring a response. Three main themes for texting topics emerged: RA symptom reporting, medication management, and COVID-19 questions. Patients with higher care complexity had a higher frequency of texting (p = 0.025); however, no association was observed with other patient characteristics.
conclusionPatients with higher complexity texted HCPs more frequently. Messages were highly aligned with patient care needs. Future directions should include assessing the impact of text messaging-enhanced care on patient outcomes and overall healthcare utilization. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.