Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41088319›Full record

ArticleResearch involvement and engagement2025

Progressing participatory research with young people in India: how a youth advisory board supported a large mental health project in Bengaluru.

Mutharaju Arelingaiah, Janardhan Navaneetham, Krupa Arasanahalli Lakshman, Jayalaxmi Kaniyagundi Podiya, Sphoorti G Prabhu, Prachi Kandeparker, Ritwika Nag, Siobhan Hugh-Jones

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research involvement and engagement, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mutharaju ArelingaiahDepartment of Psychiatric Social Work, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bengaluru, India.
Janardhan NavaneethamDepartment of Psychiatric Social Work, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bengaluru, India.
Krupa Arasanahalli LakshmanDepartment of Psychiatric Social Work, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bengaluru, India.
Jayalaxmi Kaniyagundi PodiyaDepartment of Psychiatric Social Work, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bengaluru, India.
Sphoorti G PrabhuDepartment of Psychiatric Social Work, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bengaluru, India.
Prachi KandeparkerSangath, Goa, India.
Ritwika NagDepartment of Psychiatric Social Work, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bengaluru, India.
Siobhan Hugh-JonesSchool of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK. s.hugh-jones@leeds.ac.uk.

Funding

UK's Medical Research Council, Economic and Social Research Council, National Institute of Health Research and UK Aid MR/T040238/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAction is needed to advance youth mental health research in India, and young people could significantly contribute to this. However, youth involvement in Indian research is rare, largely due to cultural norms around how research is done and the place of young people in society. There are calls for guidance on how youth involvement could be accelerated in India in ways that respect cultural norms. Youth Advisory Boards (YABs) are one means of doing this, but resources are needed to support their practical implementation in India. Our paper aims to promote the practice of YABs by detailing our experiences, challenges and solutions around hosting a YAB as part of a large mental health project based in Bengaluru, India. MAIN BODY: We hosted a YAB (n = 17 members) over three years in Project SAMA (Safeguarding Adolescent Mental Health in India). SAMA was a co-production and feasibility study of a whole-school program to address youth anxiety and depression. We viewed youth perspectives and lived experience as valuable forms of knowledge, and our ambition was for the YAB to enhance the relevance, cultural sensitivity, and effectiveness of our research. A systematic approach was adopted for the recruitment, engagement, and capacity building of YAB members. The team strived to support meaningful engagement and participatory decision-making. The YAB contributed significantly to refining our intervention, improving research tools, and contextualising findings. We identified key challenges and enablers in implementing the YAB in India.

conclusionDespite the stigma attached to mental health in India, our study shows that YABs are a feasible platform to support the involvement of young people in mental health research there. Based on our learning, we set out six recommendations to support YABs in Indian mental health research. These recommendations encourage research teams to: identify diversity and representation goals for YAB constitution; delineate the opportunities and boundaries of youth influence on project delivery; allocate sufficient resources to YAB recruitment, training, activities and communication; consider how young people's learning and accessibility needs and preferences can be ethically surfaced; and plan the monitoring and recording of the YAB's influence as well as the delivery and evaluation of reciprocal benefits to young people directly.

Indexed as

Adolescent mental healthIndiaPatient and public involvement and engagementWhole school programsYouth advisory boards

Identifiers

PMID41088319
PMCPMC12522547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.