ArticleBMC medical genomics2025
Construction and validation of a lactylation-based gene signature for prognostic assessment and immune infiltration analysis in gastric adenocarcinoma.
Article in BMC medical genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundStomach adenocarcinoma (STAD) poses a major public health challenge across various populations, necessitating the construction of robust models for prognostic prediction and effective clinical therapies. Dysregulation of lactylation, a key regulatory mechanism in cell metabolism and gene expression, can either impede or promote tumor growth and metastasis.
methodsThis study got into the bottom of TCGA-STAD-sourced transcriptome data to profile lactylation-related genes and construct a gene signature through LASSO regression. A nomogram was further created to assess the prognostic performance of this model. Our investigation primarily concentrated on the expression of Dehydrogenase/reductase 7 (DHRS7) in STAD, with the verification of its correlations with clinical characteristics, immune cell infiltration, and cellular signaling pathways.
resultsDHRS7 expressed lower in STAD tissues, and that modulating DHRS7 levels could either promote or inhibit malignant behaviors associated with STAD. In the later stages of tumor progression, DHRS7 appeared to facilitate tumor growth through mechanisms such as immune evasion and activation of PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathways, ultimately contributing to an unfavorable prognosis.
conclusionsDHRS7 has the potential to shift from acting as a tumor suppressor to functioning as an oncogene in modified TMEs, despite its lower expression levels in STAD tissues relative to normal tissues. This transformation accounts for the association between high DHRS7 expression in the later stages of STAD and a negative prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.