ArticleReproductive health2025
A qualitative exploration of the mistreatment of women during childbirth in a rural Guatemalan hospital.
Article in Reproductive health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effectiveness of a respectful maternity care program in a Guatemalan indigenous region rural hospital: a quasi-experimental study.Frontiers in global women's health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn Guatemala, many women still give birth together with traditional birth attendants at home particularly in rural settings even though births attended by skilled birth attendants in healthcare facilities have been recommended. Mistreatment of women during childbirth is recognized as one of the obstacles to childbirth in healthcare facilities. However, little research has been conducted on childbirth care and the mistreatment of women during facility-based childbirth in Guatemala. Thus, this study aimed to explore women’s experiences of care during childbirth in a rural Guatemalan hospital. The women narrated their experiences from which themes were derived (whether mistreatment or not, and if mistreatment prevailed, the type).
methodsThis qualitative study involved interviews with 20 women of reproductive age who had given birth in a hospital in Quiché Department, Guatemala, within the past six months. Data were collected by semistructured interviews between December 2022 and February 2023. The contents of the semistructured interviews were past birth experiences, a recent birth experience in a hospital, and care received from healthcare providers. Thematic analysis was performed with deductive and inductive approaches using Bohren et al.’s typology of the mistreatment of women during childbirth. The study was approved by St. Luke’s International University Research Ethics Committee and the study hospital.
resultsWomen reported experiencing various forms of mistreatment during childbirth in the rural Guatemalan hospital. These included six of the seven categories from Bohren et al.’s typology including physical abuse, verbal abuse, stigma and discrimination, failure to meet professional standards of care, poor rapport between women and providers, and health system conditions and constraints. Specifically, the participants reported experiences of reprimands and neglect by healthcare providers, as well as discrimination of those who do not speak Spanish. It became evident that mistreatment of women by healthcare providers had become normalized, and that culturally appropriate care was not adequately provided.
conclusionsEliminating or reducing mistreatment requires a multilevel approach. Healthcare providers must acquire up-to-date knowledge and skills and develop appropriate professional attitudes. Both healthcare providers and women should have increased awareness of women’s rights and mistreatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.