SynthesisEuropean journal of medical research2025
How accurate is preoperative MRI in assessing scaphoid vascularity in patients with scaphoid nonunion? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in European journal of medical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundScaphoid fractures are a prevalent and complex issue in orthopedic practice, particularly when they lead to complications, such as nonunion and avascular necrosis (AVN), especially in proximal pole fractures. Preoperative assessment of scaphoid vascularity using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has become increasingly important for guiding surgical interventions, including deciding on using avascular bone grafting or vascular grafting procedures. However, there is ongoing debate regarding the diagnostic accuracy of various MRI techniques in evaluating scaphoid vascularity. This study aims to analyze existing literature on the diagnostic efficacy of different preoperative MRI methods in assessing scaphoid viability in patients with nonunion. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis systematic review was designed based on the structure of the Preferred Checklist for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). The search strategy employed a combination of keywords and MeSH terms related to scaphoid nonunion, preoperative MRI, and vascularity assessment.
resultsAcross three databases yielded 431 articles, of which 14 were selected for meta-analysis. The diagnostic performance of these MRI techniques was evaluated, revealing pooled sensitivity and specificity values of 0.702 and 0.85, respectively. Specifically, unenhanced MRI demonstrated a pooled sensitivity of 0.63 and a specificity of 0.85, while enhanced MRI showed improved sensitivity and specificity at 0.77 and 0.87, respectively, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.83 (P < 0.0001).
conclusionsThis meta-analysis indicates that contrast-enhanced preoperative MRI provides superior sensitivity, specificity and AUC to unenhanced MRI for detecting scaphoid vascularity. In addition, the study highlights that the detection of hypointensity is a more reliable predictor of AVN, whereas isointensity may not accurately reflect scaphoid viability. Given the significant heterogeneity among studies and the lack of large, randomized trials, further well-designed studies with adequate sample sizes are necessary to confirm the effectiveness of different MRI methods in preoperatively assessing scaphoid vascularity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.