ArticleBMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation2025
Biomechanical insights into gait rehabilitation for multiple sclerosis: a narrative review of exercise modalities and progressive training approaches.
Article in BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionGait dysfunction is a pervasive and debilitating symptom in people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS), characterized by reduced walking speed, shorter stride length, increased gait variability, and compromised postural control, significantly reducing quality of life. The aim of this study is to examine the effects of various exercise modalities on gait biomechanics, evaluate the role of progressive training principles in optimizing outcomes, and provide an evidence-based framework for individualized gait rehabilitation in MS, with the goal of developing targeted exercise strategies to effectively address the multifactorial nature of gait impairments.
objectiveThis narrative review critically examines the biomechanical outcomes of structured exercise interventions for gait rehabilitation in pwMS, focusing on kinematic (e.g., joint angles), kinetic (e.g., ground reaction forces), and spatiotemporal (e.g., stride length, gait speed) parameters. It also assesses the role of progressive training principles, such as overload and task specificity, in optimizing functional outcomes.
methodsA comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus (2005 to February 2025) following PRISMA guidelines. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized trials evaluating structured exercise interventions targeting gait biomechanics in pwMS were included. Although this is a narrative review, a PRISMA-style flowchart was used to transparently illustrate the literature selection process.
resultsThe review included 15 RCTs and 6 non RCTs with sample sizes ranging from 8 to 50 participants, covering resistance training, aerobic conditioning, balance exercises, cognitive-motor training, and multimodal approaches. Key findings indicated that resistance training improved joint torque and stride length, aerobic training enhanced gait speed and endurance, and multimodal protocols yielded the most comprehensive biomechanical benefits.
conclusionHigh-intensity, task-specific training significantly improves gait biomechanics in pwMS, but the heterogeneity in study designs, small sample sizes, and limited follow-up periods highlight the need for more standardized RCTs. Personalized, progressive training remains essential for optimizing gait rehabilitation outcomes in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.