ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2025
Equity by design principles for digital health interventions.
Article in International journal for equity in health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Effectiveness of digital health interventions for the management of Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS) after sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Pooled it
- Effects of Digital Health Interventions on Breastfeeding Rates, Self-Efficacy, and Knowledge: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial Intelligence in Cardiovascular Medicine: Focus on Hypertension.Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979) · 2026Pooled it
- Digital health interventions for promoting adults lifestyle behaviors: who is being left behind? An evidence synthesis of social inequality.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2026Pooled it
- Structural biases in digital health intervention and health equity research: a bibliometric knowledge graph analysis (2015-2025).Frontiers in digital health · 2026Pooled it
- Mobile Health Interventions Across the Stroke Care Continuum: A Scoping Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Digital emergency routing: analysis of feasibility, utilization, and equity implications.Israel journal of health policy research · 2026Article
- Recurring implementation determinants in digital health innovations: a multi-context multiple case study and cross-case synthesis into a four-domain analytical framework.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Chatbots as frontline educators in sexual reproductive health rights: evidence, limitations, and ethical considerations.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Translating behavioral interventions into virtual reality: theFrontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDespite significant progress in the past decade, health disparities persist. Digital health interventions (DHIs) offer a transformative opportunity to advance health equity but may also exacerbate the digital divide if equity considerations are not embedded from the onset. While there is broad consensus on the importance of equity-centered design, a critical gap re-mains in the form of actionable guidance for both research and practice. Thus, this study aims to develop equity by design principles for DHIs.
methodsWe first synthesized existing scientific knowledge by assessing 42 articles/guidelines and formulated an initial set of 26 actionable, evidence-based design principles for DHIs (July through October 2024). We then conducted three semi-structured expert interviews to refine these principles (November 2024 through January 2025). We finally facilitated end-user workshops with two DHI providers to assess and finalize the design principles with respect to practical relevance and applicability (January through March 2025).
resultsWe identified 25 equity by design principles, 15 targeting DHIs, and 10 the organizational context in which DHIs are developed. The DHI-specific principles were categorized according to key process stages: needs assessment, design and development, implementation, and evaluation and dissemination. The organizational context principles were grouped into four domains: strategy, people, processes and structures, and partnerships and advocacy. We further challenged the principles real-world applicability, identifying three overarching challenges that hinder their successful implementation.
conclusionsThe study underscores the necessity of moving beyond DHI-specific design considerations to address health inequities in digital health. By adopting these design principles, digital health companies can embed equity as a core strategic priority, actively contribute to reducing health disparities, and foster a more inclusive healthcare ecosystem.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.