ArticleBMC research notes2025
Enhancing learning skills in children by using assistive technology: a psychophysiological database.
Article in BMC research notes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThe present dataset provides psychometric and electroencephalographic information from children with either reading or math difficulties. This data was collected before and after children utilized Smartick, an assistive technology that boosts reading and math proficiency. This dataset aims to understand how assistive technology can support learning in children. DATA DESCRIPTION: Seventy-six Mexican children aged 7 to 13 were recruited for this study. Every child underwent a psychometric assessment to identify learning difficulties. Then, each child was categorized within the group of reading difficulties or math difficulties. After that, children underwent electroencephalographic recording in two conditions: (1) resting state and (2) while performing reading or math activities. Each child was reallocated to (1) the experimental subgroup, which interacted with Smartick, and (2) the control subgroup, which did not enroll in the intervention. Finally, psychometric and electroencephalographic (EEG) data were collected again after a three-month follow-up period. All electroencephalographic recordings are presented in set format. The authors also share different .xlsx files describing: (1) psychometric results throughout the study, (2) the availability of electroencephalographic data, event list within the electroencephalographic recordings during (3) reading activities and (4) math activities, and (5) the engagement percentage with Smartick in the experimental group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.