ArticleBiology direct2025
Measles and public health: an integrative approach.
Article in Biology direct, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Change in trust in public health authorities, medical care providers, health scientists, and provincial and federal governments in Canada, from before COVID-19 pandemic to May 2024.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2026Article
- A Rise in Measles Reporting Two Years After the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Descriptive Analysis of Measles in Iraq in 2023 and Early 2024.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Article
- Spatiotemporal Dynamics of the 2025-2026 Measles Outbreak in Mexico: Jalisco as the Emerging Epicenter and the Impact of Intensive Immunization Efforts.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Assessment of Measles Immunity in the Croatian Population: A Retrospective Seroprevalence Study, 2015-2025.Vaccines · 2026Article
- Quantifying the impact of time-delayed reporting and supportive care in measles outbreak: A simulation approach for Texas, USA.Science progressArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMeasles, once considered under control in many high-income countries, has experienced a notable resurgence in recent years due to declining vaccination rates, increased vaccine hesitancy, and gaps in public health preparedness. This study provides an overview of the current measles outbreaks in two socio-culturally distinct realities, both facing a challenging epidemiological situation, i.e., the Region of the Americas and Italy, the European country most impacted after Romania. The aim is to understand transmission dynamics and identify factors contributing to outbreak severity.
resultsEpidemiological data show that Canada experienced an unprecedented increase in measles incidence, particularly in Ontario and Alberta, where spatial modelling revealed relative risks greater than 30 in high burden areas (i.e., the estimated likelihood of measles occurrence in these areas was more than 30 times higher than the national average, based on Bayesian spatial modeling). In Mexico, the epidemic was highly localised, with over 90% of cases and all but one death concentrated in the state of Chihuahua. In the United States, 89% of cases were linked to epidemic outbreaks, with Texas showing significant spatial clustering and daily growth rates of over 4% in high-risk counties. In Italy, the 2024 outbreak marked a significant increase in measles cases compared to previous years, primarily affecting unvaccinated individuals. Over 50% of those affected required hospitalization, and major urban regions such as Lazio and Lombardy experienced sustained transmission. An initial phase of exponential growth (66% monthly) was followed by a plateau, with no significant decline observed, underlining delays in containment and persistent immune deficiencies. From genetic point of view, the study revealed the predominance of genotype D8, known for sustained global circulation, suggesting a single transmission chain behind the recent outbreaks. Phylogenetic analysis showed no significant intra-genotypic diversification, suggesting that the outbreak likely originated from a single introduction event followed by rapid, localized transmission. This limited genetic variation is consistent with a short transmission window and the absence of strong evolutionary pressure.
conclusionThe outbreaks in the United States and Italy, despite differences in healthcare systems and sociopolitical contexts, reveal common underlying issues. In the U.S., the epidemic was characterized by clusters of unvaccinated individuals in certain communities, while Italy faced challenges due to gaps in routine immunization programs and delays in responding to the outbreak. Both outbreaks illustrate the devastating impact of under-vaccination, inadequate surveillance, and the spread of misinformation on public health. Our results contribute to a deeper understanding of the dynamics of measles recurrence, providing a solid basis for science-based prevention and control measures. Furthermore, the study emphasises the importance of continuous and integrated surveillance to detect emerging or divergent strains at an early stage. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.