ArticleJournal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England)2025
Preparation methodology evaluation of rat pulmonary tissues containing mineral fibers following inhalation exposure to Libby amphibole asbestos.
Article in Journal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundInhaled mineral fibers including asbestos are associated with lung cancer and pleural disease. In this study, we evaluated methodologies for mineral fiber isolation with subsequent physical and chemical characterization from pulmonary tissues of rats exposed to Libby amphibole asbestos 2007 (LA 2007) fibers via repeated nose-only inhalation. At the completion of the exposures, lungs were collected either as is or instilled with liquid agarose to produce a pulmonary cast. To extract fibers, lung tissue with and without pulmonary casts were further processed by either high temperature ashing or chemical digestion. The use of liquid agarose to produce pulmonary casts was discontinued after the first study assessment as no fibers were present in the pleural cavity for evaluation. Fibers isolated from the lungs were analyzed by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) coupled with selected area electron diffraction (SAED) and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) for physical and chemical characterization. The bulk LA 2007 test material was also analyzed to provide comparison of fiber dimensions and chemical composition of the fibers introduced during exposure. Particular interest was focused on the comparison between high temperature ashing and chemical digestion extraction methodologies.
resultsChemical digestion of lung tissue with and without pulmonary casts resulted in fiber dimensions and chemical profiles similar to the bulk LA 2007 test chemical and exposure atmosphere. Conversely, high temperature ashing resulted in degraded fibers with chemically altered profiles.
conclusionsBased on the findings in this study, chemical digestion of lung tissue is the preferred preparation method for the isolation of inhaled mineral fibers for lung burden analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.