ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2025
The role of four ERS-related key genes in sepsis induced organ dysfunction and the forewarning model construction.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
bakgroundSepsis/septic shock frequently occurred as a lethal complication in the intensive care unit. Endoplasmic reticulum stress (ERS) leading to the disturbance of cellular proteostasis played an important role in the sepsis-induced multiple organ dysfunction. Previous studies showed that several ERS molecule were involved in. It is not clear which ERS molecule could be competent as prognostic indicators of sepsis.
methodsTranscriptomic datasets containing gene expression profiles of sepsis patients and healthy controls were downloaded from the GEO database. Consensus clustering was performed to identify sepsis molecular subtypes associated with ERS. An integrated machine learning approach was conducted to screen potential prognostic markers for sepsis.
resultsThe overactivated ERS-related sepsis subgroup were identified according to higher APACHE II scores and poor prognosis. Further molecular characterization and immune function analysis of this subgroup revealed that overactivated ERS-related sepsis was linked to excessive neutrophil extracellular trap (NET) formation, inflammatory response and pronounced immunosuppression. AHSP, FIS1, REXO2 and SYF2 were identified as key prognostic markers for this sepsis subtype. Their expressions following sepsis and their role in the severity of sepsis were validated by in vivo experiments. Furthermore, a prognostic risk model with the four genes was established as an independent and superior prognostic indicator, outperforming APACHE IV score and cardiovascular insufficiency in predicting outcome for septic patients.
conclusionIn summary, four ERS-related genes play an important role in sepsis-induced organ dysfunction, and the ERS-related prognostic model shows great potential as a major forewarning model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.