ArticleBMC oral health2025
Development and validation of artificial intelligence models for automated periodontitis staging and grading using panoramic radiographs.
Article in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diagnostic Performance of Artificial Intelligence Models for Periodontitis Disease Detection Using Panoramic Radiographs: A Systematic Review.Dentistry journal · 2026Review
- A Deep Learning Model for Second-Molar Lesions Related to Impacted Third Molars.International dental journal · 2026Article
- Fractal Analysis and Artificial Intelligence for Radiographic Detection of Periodontal Bone Loss: A Systematic Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Application of artificial intelligence in oral health management: challenges and opportunities.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPeriodontal diseases are common chronic conditions that can lead to tooth loss and systemic complications if not diagnosed and treated promptly. The 2017 classification by the American Academy of Periodontology highlights the need for effective, accurate diagnostic tools. This study aimed to develop and validate an AI-driven system for automated staging and grading periodontitis from panoramic radiographs using the YOLOv8 architecture.
methodsA total of five hundred panoramic radiographs from patients diagnosed with periodontitis were included. Radiographs were labeled and split into training (75%), validation (15%), and testing (10%) sets. Three specialized YOLOv8-based models were trained to segment the alveolar bone level, the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ), and tooth axes. Image augmentations were applied to enhance model robustness. The resulting measurements of radiographic bone loss were combined with patient information (age, smoking status, diabetes) to identify periodontitis stage and grade following the 2017 guidelines.
resultsThe bone level and CEJ detection models achieved high precision (0.95-0.97) and recall (0.94-0.96), reflecting strong segmentation performance. The tooth detection model achieved a precision of approximately 0.82 and a recall of 0.81. Integrating all three models enabled automated determination of periodontal stage (I-IV) and grade (A-C), with an interactive interface allowing clinicians to review and adjust outputs if necessary.
conclusionThe proposed YOLOv8-based framework accurately detects key periodontal landmarks and automates disease staging and grading. Future work should expand the dataset, refine the tooth detection model, and validate the system in clinical settings to support large-scale periodontal screening and improved patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.