Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41088203›Full record

SynthesisWorld journal of surgical oncology2025

Cardiopulmonary bypass versus non-bypass surgery for tumor thrombus extending into the inferior vena cava or right atrium in non-cardiac malignancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ahmed Dawood Al Mahrizi, Fatima Mossolem, Fatima Zahra Achaq, Erin Major, Moiuz Chaudhri, Arthur Okere

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-AnalysisComparative Study
In one paragraph

Synthesis in World journal of surgical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ahmed Dawood Al MahriziFaculty of Medicine & Surgery, University of Malta, Msida, Malta. ahmed.d.almahrizi.22@um.edu.mt.
Fatima MossolemFutures Forward Research Institute, Toms River, NJ, USA.
Fatima Zahra AchaqFutures Forward Research Institute, Toms River, NJ, USA.
Erin MajorFutures Forward Research Institute, Toms River, NJ, USA.
Moiuz ChaudhriHackensack Meridian Ocean University Medical Center, Brick Township, NJ, USA.
Arthur OkereHackensack Meridian Ocean University Medical Center, Brick Township, NJ, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe role of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in surgery for tumor thrombi extending into the inferior vena cava (IVC) or right atrium in noncardiac malignancies remains controversial. We systematically compared perioperative mortality and complications between the CPB and non-CPB approaches and summarized findings on surgical techniques and patient selection.

methodsWe searched major databases for studies (2015-2025) reporting surgical resection of IVC or right atrial tumor thrombi in noncardiac malignancies stratified by CPB use. Twenty studies were included in the qualitative synthesis, and nine were included in the quantitative meta-analysis. Pooled perioperative mortality and complications were compared via random effects models. Heterogeneity and correlations between CPB use and mortality were assessed.

resultsSurgical approaches varied. CPB was typically reserved for extensive thrombus or right atrial involvement. The complication and recurrence rates were heterogeneous. In nine studies (800 patients), the pooled perioperative mortality rate was 9.2% (95% CI: 4.7-17.1%), with no significant difference between the CPB (10.3%) and non-CPB (7.8%) groups. High heterogeneity reflected differences in patient selection, tumor extent, and surgical technique. Qualitative synthesis indicated that CPB increased procedural complexity and risk but was utilized for more advanced disease. Recurrence and long-term outcomes have been inconsistently reported. Most studies were retrospective and at moderate to serious risk of bias.

conclusionSurgical management with or without CPB results in similar perioperative mortality rates. CPB is generally reserved for extensive thrombi, adding complexity and risk. Individualized, multidisciplinary planning is essential. Prospective studies are needed to refine patient selection and optimize surgical strategies in this challenging setting.

Indexed as

Cardiopulmonary BypassHeart AtriaNeoplasmsThrombosisVena Cava, InferiorHumansPostoperative ComplicationsPrognosisCardiopulmonary bypassInferior vena cavaNoncardiac malignanciesRight atriumSurgical managementTumor thrombus

Identifiers

PMID41088203
PMCPMC12522322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.