ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2025
Ensemble techniques for predictive modeling of leishmanial activity via molecular fingerprints.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Recent advances in machine learning and Bayesian modeling for tropical disease prediction, diagnosis, and risk analysis: a scoping review.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLeishmaniasis, a neglected tropical disease caused by Leishmania protozoan parasites and transmitted by sandflies, poses a significant global health challenge, especially in resource-limited environments. The life cycle of the parasite includes crucial amastigote and promastigote stages, each contributing importantly to the infection process. The current therapies for leishmaniasis face limitations due to considerable side effects and the rise of drug-resistant strains, underscoring the pressing need for new, effective, and safe treatment options. Recent advancements in leishmaniasis vaccine development include live attenuated vaccines, recombinant vaccines, and the use of synthetic biology. These approaches aim to induce robust immune responses while ensuring safety. Controlled human infection studies are also being explored to accelerate vaccine development. However, a licensed vaccine remains elusive.
methodThis study introduces a novel method for drug discovery targeting leishmaniasis, employing machine learning and cheminformatics to forecast the efficacy of compounds against Leishmania promastigotes. A detailed dataset consisting of 65,057 molecules sourced from the PubChem database is utilized, with the Alamar Blue-based assay applied to assess drug susceptibility. The data encoding relies on molecular fingerprints derived from Simplified Molecular Input Line Entry System (SMILES) notations. We employed three distinct fingerprint algorithms, Avalon, MACCS Key, and Pharmacophore, for the development of machine learning models. Various algorithms, including random forest, multilayer perceptron, gradient boosting, and decision tree, are utilized to create models that effectively classify molecules as either active or inactive based on their structural and chemical characteristics, which could significantly impact the drug discovery process for leishmaniasis.
resultsWe additionally introduced a model based on ensembles, achieving a peak accuracy of 83.65% and an area under the curve of 0.8367. This study offers significant promise in enhancing drug discovery efforts focused on tackling the global issue of leishmaniasis.
conclusionFurthermore, the proposed approach has the potential to serve as a framework for addressing other overlooked tropical diseases, offering a promising alternative to conventional drug discovery methods and their associated difficulties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.