Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41088196›Full record

ArticleBMC veterinary research2025

Knowledge, attitude, and husbandry practices on zoonoses prevention and control among livestock farmers in Thiruvarur, Tamil Nadu, India: a cross-sectional study.

Poulin Mariasusai, Natarajan Gopalan, Sujit Kumar Behera, Yilma Markos Larebo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC veterinary research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Poulin Mariasusai *Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, School of Life Sciences, Central University of Tamil Nadu, P.O. Box: 610005, Thiruvarur, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-3923-7162
Natarajan Gopalan *Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, School of Life Sciences, Central University of Tamil Nadu, P.O. Box: 610005, Thiruvarur, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6521-1744
Sujit Kumar Behera *Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, School of Life Sciences, Central University of Tamil Nadu, P.O. Box: 610005, Thiruvarur, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2495-1535
Yilma Markos Larebo *Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Wachemo University, P.O. Box: 667, Hossana, Ethiopia. yilmamark@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7084-1313

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundZoonotic diseases remain a significant public health and economic concern in low- and middle-income countries, particularly among livestock farmers. This problem is further aggravated by the widespread lack of awareness regarding the transmission, prevention, and control of zoonoses. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the knowledge, attitude, and husbandry practices on zoonoses prevention and control among livestock farmers in Thiruvarur, Tamil Nadu, India.

methodsA community-based cross-sectional study was conducted from October 1 to December 1, 2024. A total of 565 livestock farmers were selected using simple random sampling techniques. Data collection was conducted using an interviewer-administered questionnaire. The collected data were entered and analysed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 20. A multivariable logistic regression model was employed to determine the relationship between the predictor and outcome variables. Statistical significance was set at a p < 0.05.

resultsThe overall response rate was 95.6%. The mean age of livestock farmers was 45.69 ± 12.01 years, with the majority (155, 28.7%) aged 41–50 years. Among the 540 livestock farmers surveyed, 31.7% (95% 28.1, 35.7) had good knowledge, 55% (95% CI: 50.9,59.1) had positive attitudes, and 47.2% (95% CI: 43.1, 51.3) had good husbandry practices towards zoonotic diseases prevention and control, respectively. Public sector employees (AOR: 0.43, 95% CI: 0.21–0.84, P = 0.014); livestock farmers who owned their land (AOR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.29–0.82, P = 0.007); and farmers using intensive farming systems (AOR: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.32–0.99, P = 0.044) were associated with a lower risk of zoonoses prevention and control with good husbandry practice. Meanwhile, farmers with livestock shelters less than 100 m from their homes (AOR: 2.15, 95% CI: 1.06–4.37, P = 0.034) were associated with an increased risk of zoonoses prevention and control with good husbandry practices, with a p-value of less than 0.05.

conclusionThis study revealed that livestock farmers had low knowledge, attitudes, and husbandry practices towards preventing and controlling zoonotic diseases. Targeted education and one health interventions should prioritize high-risk farmers without land ownership, using extensive systems, or with nearby livestock shelters. Promoting intensive farming, safe housing practices, and capacity building will enhance zoonotic disease prevention and control.

Indexed as

Animal HusbandryFarmersHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeZoonosesAdultAnimalsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansIndiaLivestockMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesAttitudeIndiaKnowledgeLivestock farmersPracticesZoonoses

Identifiers

PMID41088196
PMCPMC12522273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.