ArticleBMC oral health2025
Effect of proanthocyanidins application on push-out bond strength of root canal filling after different final irrigation procedures.
Article in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study aims to investigate the effects of using EDTA, phytic acid (IP6), chitosan, and proanthocyanidin (PAs) as final irrigation solutions on the push-out bond strength (PBS) of root canal filling. MATERIALS
methodsIn the present study, 56 extracted human incisors were utilized. All teeth were decoronated at the cementoenamel junction. Following the root canal chemomechanical preparation, the teeth were randomly divided into 7 groups according to the final irrigation procedures: Group 1: Control, Group 2: EDTA, Group 3: IP6, Group 4: Chitosan, Group 5: EDTA + PAs, Group 6: IP6 + PAs, Group 7: Chitosan + PAs. The root canals were filled using the cold lateral condensation technique with gutta-percha and resin-based root canal sealer. Samples were obtained horizontally cut from the apical third of the teeth and subjected to push-out bond strength (PBS) using a universal testing machine. Data was statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey HSD test (α = 0.05).
resultsThe highest value was obtained in Group 6 (12.14 ± 0.47 MPa), and the lowest value in Group 1 (5.80 ± 0,44 MPa) (P < 0.05). Group 6 has shown a higher PBS value than Group 5 (11.72 ± 0.14 MPa) and Group 7 (11.94 ± 0.42 MPa) (P > 0.05). There were statistically significant differences between all other groups, except Groups 3 and 4 (P < 0.05). The failure type was mostly adhesive, and no cohesive failures were observed.
conclusionThe use of EDTA, IP6, and chitosan for final irrigation has enhanced the bond strength values of resin-based root canal sealer to dentin. Furthermore, the use of PAs after EDTA, IP6, and chitosan increased the bond strength values more than when these solutions were used alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.