ArticleBMC public health2025
Community perspectives on the built environment, community stress, and the risk of diabetes and cardiovascular diseases in Accra, Ghana.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe growing burden of diabetes and other non-communicable diseases in Africa demands greater understanding of the contextual drivers of risk factors, including the built environment. Cognitive Mapping (CM) is a participatory research approach that allows community members to visualise their environmental context through drawing. The maps express in visual form the situated knowledge of the environment from local perceptions of daily experiences. This study combines Geographic Information System (GIS) techniques and qualitative research methods to explore community perspectives on the environmental risk factors of diabetes and other cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) in a poor urban community in Accra, Ghana.
methodsFive Cognitive Map Focus Group Discussions (CM-FGDs) and four regular Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) were conducted with a total of 43 participants in Ga Mashie (Accra) in November and December 2022. Participants (25 women and 18 men) had lived in the study communities for over ten years. Community members were given paper and a pencil for the CM sessions to draw their environment. GIS maps supplemented the community drawings. We adopted geo-ethnography, a technique that combines GIS and qualitative analytical methods. The GIS was used to recreate aspects of the physical environment discussed by study participants. The FGDs were analysed thematically.
resultsParticipants recognised the physical and social attributes of their daily environment and how these attributes influence the risk of CVDs. Excessive heat and hazardous noise from overcrowded spaces emerged as key health risks. The social environment was equally important – participants often linked the high concentration of bars, spaces for social interaction and several social engagements at weekends to excessive consumption of alcohol and unhealthy food. Community members reported that social behaviour and diet associated with their environments were gradually deteriorating, and these accounted for observed changes in patterns of diabetes and related CVDs. Specifically, community members attributed the causes of hypertension and heart disease to hazardous noise and psychological distress associated with the built environment. In contrast, diabetes was generally attributed to the social environment.
conclusionCognitive maps allowed community members to participate in research and link the risk of diabetes and CVDs to their changing environment. Built environment interventions should empower communities to make large-scale behavioural modifications to improve the prevention and control of diabetes and CVDs within their community.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.