Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41088174›Full record

ArticleBMC biology2025

Female fruit flies use social cues to make egg-clustering decisions.

Emily R Churchill, Emily K Fowler, Lucy A Friend, Marco Archetti, Douglas W Yu, Andrew F G Bourke, Tracey Chapman, Amanda Bretman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Emily R ChurchillSchool of Biology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0910-8600
Emily K FowlerSchool of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5290-7630
Lucy A FriendSchool of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5728-9384
Marco ArchettiDepartment of Biology, Pennsylvania State University, State College, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8303-1632
Douglas W YuSchool of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8551-5609
Andrew F G BourkeSchool of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5891-8816
Tracey ChapmanSchool of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK. tracey.chapman@uea.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2401-8120
Amanda BretmanSchool of Biology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK. a.j.bretman@leeds.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4421-3337

Funding

Natural Environment Research Council NE/T007133/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe ability to respond plastically to environmental variation is a key determinant of fitness. Females may use cues to strategically place their eggs, for example adjusting the number or location of eggs according to whether other females are present and driving the dynamics of local competition or cooperation. The expression of plasticity in egg-laying patterns within individual patches (i.e. in contact clusters or not) represents an additional, under-researched, and potentially important opportunity for fitness gains. Clustered eggs might benefit from increased protection or defence, and clustering could facilitate cooperative feeding. However, increased clustering is also expected to increase the risk of overexploitation through direct competition. These potential benefits and costs likely covary with the number of individuals present; hence, egg-clustering behaviour within resource patches should be socially responsive. We investigate this new topic using the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster.

resultsOur mathematical model, parameterised by data, verified that females cluster their eggs non-randomly and increase clustering as group size increases. We also showed that as the density of adult females increased, females laid more eggs, laid them faster, and laid more eggs in clusters. Females also preferred to place eggs within existing clusters. Most egg clusters were of mixed maternity.

conclusionsCollectively, the results reveal that females express plasticity in egg clustering according to social environment cues and prefer to lay in clusters of mixed maternity, despite the potential for increased competition. These findings are consistent with egg-clustering plasticity being selected due to cooperative benefits.

Indexed as

CuesDrosophila melanogasterOvipositionOvumSocial BehaviorAnimalsFemaleModels, BiologicalCooperative ovipositionDrosophila melanogasterLaying ratePublic goodsSocial density

Identifiers

PMID41088174
PMCPMC12522869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.