ArticleOrphanet journal of rare diseases2025
Feasibility of machine learning analysis for the identification of patients with possible primary ciliary dyskinesia.
Article in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Systematic review of artificial intelligence and digital-automated tools for screening, diagnosis and characterisation of primary ciliary dyskinesia.ERJ open research · 2026Article
- Machine Learning, Large Language Models, and Multimodal AI for Diagnosing Pediatric Rare Diseases: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Harnessing artificial intelligence for pediatric health: Current trends and future opportunities.iScience · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSignificant diagnostic delays are common in primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD), a rare disease that is significantly underdiagnosed. Scalable screening methods could improve early identification and health outcomes. RESEARCH QUESTION: Can machine learning (ML) be used to screen for PCD in pediatric patients? STUDY DESIGN AND
methodsWe evaluated the feasibility of a random forest model to screen for PCD using data from the PCD Foundation Registry and a national claims database. We identified a cohort of pediatric patients (< 18 years of age) with diagnostic codes indicative of conditions potentially associated with PCD, and studied diagnostic, procedural, and pharmaceutical codes associated with PCD to develop ML features. Models were trained on composite claims data from confirmed patients with PCD, patients with Q34.8 (Specific Congenital Malformation of the Respiratory System) diagnosed within 6 months of an Electron Microscopy procedure (Q34.8 + EM), and a randomly-selected, matched control group. Model performance was tested through fivefold cross-validation.
resultsUsing 82 confirmed pediatric PCD cases and 4161 matched controls, the model demonstrated variable performance (positive predictive value 0.45-0.73, sensitivity 0.75-0.94). Synthetic data augmentation did not improve results (positive predictive value 0.45-0.67, sensitivity 0.71-1.00). Expanding the dataset to include 319 Q34.8 + EM patients and 8214 controls improved performance (positive predictive value 0.51-0.54, sensitivity 0.82-0.90), suitable for screening. In a cohort of 1.32 million pediatric patients, 7705 were classified as positive, consistent with the estimated prevalence of PCD (1:7554).
interpretationThis study demonstrates the feasibility of using ML to screen for PCD using claims data, even in the absence of a specific International Classification of Disease (ICD) code. While unvalidated, this work may serve as the basis for future ML efforts in rare disease detection. Such screening approaches may aid in the identification of individuals who may benefit from timely diagnostic testing and targeted interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.