ArticleBMC nursing2025
Artificial intelligence in nursing practice: a qualitative study of nurses' perspectives on opportunities, challenges, and ethical implications.
Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Ethical concerns and strategies for implementing artificial intelligence in healthcare: a review of empirical studies.BMC medical ethics · 2026Pooled it
- Evidence on artificial intelligence-assisted clinical documentation and healthcare workers' emotional wellbeing at work: a scoping review.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Pooled it
- Stakeholder experience with artificial intelligence in healthcare: a bibliometric study of satisfaction, trust, acceptance, and patient engagement.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Pooled it
- The role of digital literacy and ethical awareness in nurses' acceptance of Artificial Intelligence: a cross-sectional questionnaire survey.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2026Article
- When Care Becomes Digital: Shared Experiences in Psychiatric Nursing-A Phenomenological Study.Journal of psychiatric and mental health nursing · 2026Article
- The Association Between Perceived Ability to Use Artificial Intelligence, Self-Reported Nursing Productivity, and Self-Reported Practice Readiness Among Nurses in Saudi Arabia: A Multicentre Cross-Sectional Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Nurses' Ethical Reasoning About Digital Ethical Risks: A Vignette-Elicited Qualitative Study.International nursing review · 2026Article
- The Mediating Role of Work Engagement Between Artificial Intelligence Anxiety and Task Performance Among Nurses: A Cross-Sectional Correlational Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A concept analysis of artificial intelligence anxiety among nurses based on Walker and Avant's method.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Advantages, limitations, and ethical concerns of AI-assisted qualitative research in nursing: insights from a human-AI comparative thematic analysis.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Chinese version of the Nurses' AI Ethical Awareness Scale: translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and psychometric evaluation among hospital nurses.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- [Latent profile analysis of nursesZhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2026Article
- Beyond Algorithmic Oversight: Internal Morality of Medicine and Meaningful Human Control in AI-Assisted Care.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Perceptions of Intensive Care Nurses Toward Artificial Intelligence Technologies: A Qualitative Study.Nursing & health sciences · 2026Article
- [Artificial intelligence and disinformation in health: The need for re-education from primary care].Atencion primaria · 2026Review
- Review
- Artificial intelligence self-efficacy and attitudes among nursing students: a multicenter network analysis of educational stratification.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- The relationship between nurses' anxiety and attitudes towards artificial intelligence and examination of influencing factors.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Impact of Hospital Hierarchy on Nurses' Attitudes Toward Artificial Intelligence: Mediating Roles of Artificial Intelligence Literacy and Anxiety.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
- Analysis of latent profiles and influencing factors of artificial intelligence anxiety among newly recruited nurses: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe study aims to explore nurses' views on the effects of artificial intelligence (AI) in nursing, focusing on their understanding, practical applications, ethical considerations, and perceived opportunities and threats.
methodsThis qualitative study used semi[Formula: see text]structured interviews to gain comprehensive insights from clinical nurses, adhering to the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research for methodological rigor. After obtaining ethical approval, researchers conducted semi[Formula: see text]structured interviews with 25 clinical nurses. The interviews explored nurses' perceptions of AI, including its basic concepts, applications in nursing practice, ethical and social implications, and potential benefits and drawbacks.
resultsThe analysis identified four overarching themes: (1) Nurses' Conceptualizations of Artificial Intelligence, (2) Opportunities of AI in Nursing Practice, (3) Threats of AI in Nursing Practice, and (4) Ethical and Psychological Concerns in AI-Based Nursing Practice. The findings revealed that nurses had a foundational understanding of AI and its definitions. They acknowledged both the positive and negative impacts of AI technologies on their practice. Nurses expressed that AI could reduce workload, enhance patient care, and improve efficiency. However, they also articulated significant threats, including concerns over professional redundancy, emotional disconnection in caregiving, de-skilling, and the risk of dehumanizing the healthcare environment. Additionally, ethical and psychological concerns emerged, such as ambiguity in accountability, threats to data security and patient safety, unsuitability in psychiatric care contexts, staff surveillance anxiety, and risks of misuse or systemic bias.
conclusionThe study concluded that while nurses possess a basic understanding of AI, the effective and ethical integration of AI technologies in nursing requires targeted training, institutional preparedness, and robust interdisciplinary collaboration. To ensure AI complements rather than compromises nursing values, it is imperative to equip nurses with skills in digital literacy, ethical reasoning, and critical engagement with AI tools. The findings highlight the necessity of structured education programs and policy development that address both the technological and humanistic dimensions of AI use in healthcare. Future research should actively incorporate patient and public voices to ensure that AI-driven transformations in care remain aligned with the principles of patient-centeredness and human dignity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.