Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41088156›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2025

Role of distance in the utilization of emergency departments for non-traumatic dental conditions in Maryland, USA, 2017-2021.

Uma Kelekar, Shillpa Naavaal, Sidney Carl Turner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Uma KelekarHealthcare Management, School of Business, College of Business, Innovation, Leadership and Technology, Marymount University, 2807 North Glebe Road, Arlington, VA, 22207, USA. ukelekar@marymount.edu.
Shillpa NaavaalDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry and Department of Dental Public Health and Policy, School of Dentistry Virginia Commonwealth University, Virginia Address 1101 E. Leigh Street, Perkinson Building, Suite 3100, Richmond, VA, 23298, USA.
Sidney Carl TurnerFors Marsh, 4250 Fairfax Drive, Suite 520, Arlington, VA, 22203, USA.

Funding

CareQuest Institute for Oral Health G-2209-17559
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDisparities in access to oral health are evident in Emergency Departments' (EDs) utilization for non-traumatic dental conditions (NTDCs) in the United States (US). While studies have examined the associations of socio-economic factors with ED utilization, there is little evidence of the role of distance on EDs use for NTDCs. To fill the gap, the main objectives of our study were to: (i) assess how geographic proximity to the nearest ED influences utilization of NTDCs (ii) examine how utilization varies with distance to nearest private dental clinics, community health centers or federally qualified health centers and urgent care clinics.

methodsWe used the State Emergency Department Database and The American Dental Association provider data files for 2017-2021 for Maryland. Following the Dental Quality Alliance (DQA) guidelines, we extracted NTDC visits using ICD-10 diagnoses codes. On using negative binomial regression models, we estimated the ED utilization rate for the overall population as well as for sub-groups defined by age, race/ethnicity and payer as a function of nearest distances between the patient zip code and an ED facility; as well as to dental providers, while controlling for confounders.

resultsThe average NTDC utilization rate declined (β= -0.299; 95% CI: [-0.411, -0.188) as distance to the nearest ED increased, while utilization was positively associated with distance to a nearest provider (β = 0.313; 95% CI: 0.200, 0.425). Distance decay effect amongst NH Blacks was the highest and different from that of NH Whites: there was a decline of 40.4% and 16.9% in ED visits with doubling of distance, respectively. Significant differences were reported between children (β = 0.236, 95% CI: 0.086, 0.386) and young adults aged 19-34 years (β = 0.395, 95% CI: 0.265, 0.526) in utilization as distance to a nearest provider increased. Lastly, a doubling of distance to Medicaid-accepting dentists or those affiliated with FQHCs was linked to an approximately 23% increase in ED use for NTDCs.

conclusionsOur findings show evidence of a distance decay effect with respect to ED utilization for NTDC visits, while also demonstrating a decline in ED visits when a dental provider was nearby suggesting an interplay of perceived need, cost, and access to dental care in the community.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalHealth Services AccessibilityAdolescentAdultAgedChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMaleMarylandMiddle AgedYoung AdultDental clinicsDental conditionsDistanceDistance decayEmergency departmentsMarylandNTDCsUtilization

Identifiers

PMID41088156
PMCPMC12523134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.