Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41088147›Full record

ArticleTrials2025

REACT SHOCK trial protocol and analysis plan-a multicenter randomised controlled trial comparing individualised blood pressure target versus standard blood pressure target among critically ill patients with shock.

Rakshit Panwar, Alison Gibberd, Chris Oldmeadow, Ravindranath Tiruvoipati, Anders Åneman, Amit Kansal, REACT SHOCK investigators

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05850962 (Individualised Blood Pressure Targets Versus Standard Care Among Critically Ill Patients With Shock - A Multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05850962 narecruitingnot on this map

Individualised Blood Pressure Targets Versus Standard Care Among Critically Ill Patients With Shock - A Multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorRakshit PanwarRan2023 to 2028Enrolled1,260ConditionsCritical Illness, ShockArmsIndividualised MAP target
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rakshit PanwarIntensive Care Unit, John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, Australia. rakshit.panwar@health.nsw.gov.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9090-8829
Alison GibberdData Sciences, Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, Australia.
Chris OldmeadowSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia.
Ravindranath TiruvoipatiIntensive Care Unit, Peninsula Health, Frankston, Australia.
Anders ÅnemanDepartment of Intensive Care, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Amit KansalDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Ng Teng Fong General Hospital, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.
REACT SHOCK investigators

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council 2022/MRF2019812
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCritically ill patients with shock receiving vasopressor or inotrope therapy in ICU are often exposed to relative hypotension, which is quantified as percentage blood pressure deficit relative to usual pre-illness blood pressure. Whether minimising such blood pressure deficit, by adjusting blood pressure targets according to patients' pre-illness blood pressure (individualised blood pressure target strategy), can improve clinical outcomes remains unclear. Therefore, we are conducting a multicenter randomised controlled trial, the REACT SHOCK RCT, comparing individualised blood pressure targets to standard care among critically ill patients with shock.

methodsThe REACT SHOCK RCT is an international, multicenter, parallel-group, randomised, standard-care controlled, clinical superiority trial that will be conducted in up to 35 ICUs in Australia, Ireland, Singapore, UK and USA. In total, 1260 patients, receiving vasopressor therapy for non-haemorrhagic shock in ICU, will be randomly assigned to individualised mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) targets (determined as an average of 2-5 recent pre-illness blood pressure readings within last 3 years, with a MAP target range of 55 to 95 mmHg) or standard care (default MAP target of 65 mmHg) in a 1:1 ratio. The REACT SHOCK RCT is anticipated to complete recruitment by 2028. The primary endpoint is all-cause 14-day mortality. Secondary endpoints are major adverse kidney events by day 14, all-cause 90-day mortality, survival time to 14 days and 90 days, and renal replacement therapy free days by day 28. DISCUSSION: The REACT SHOCK RCT is the first international multicenter randomised clinical trial designed to ascertain whether an individualised blood pressure target strategy is superior to standard care for critically ill patients with shock. This trial will generate evidence that may influence current recommendations for MAP targets during management of shock in ICU. The pre-specified protocol summary and statistical analysis plan are presented here.

trial registrationProspectively registered on Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTRN 12623000044628); ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT05850962 dated 29th April 2023.

Indexed as

Blood PressureBlood Pressure DeterminationShockVasoconstrictor AgentsCritical IllnessEquivalence Trials as TopicHumansIntensive Care UnitsMulticenter Studies as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeVasoconstrictor AgentsBlood pressure targetsCritical illnessMortalityProtocolRandomised clinical trialRelative hypotensionShockStatistics

Identifiers

PMID41088147
PMCPMC12522556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.