ReviewOrphanet journal of rare diseases2025
The impact of desmoid tumors: insights from the Desmoid Tumor Research Foundation Natural History Study, 2017-2023.
Review in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDesmoid tumors (DT) are rare, locally aggressive soft tissue tumors that pose considerable diagnostic and treatment challenges, and may negatively impact patients' overall quality of life (QoL). This analysis examines three aspects of the real-world patient experience with DT: (1) demographics and disease characteristics, (2) the journey from initial signs and symptoms to definitive DT diagnosis and treatment, and (3) QoL. The ongoing Desmoid Tumor Research Foundation (DTRF) Patient Registry and Natural History Study (NHS) examines patient-reported survey data to characterize the real-world nature and impact of DT, including clinical history, prior and current treatment, and QoL. The GOunder/DTRF Desmoid Symptom/Impact Scale (GODDESS
methodsThis analysis was performed on data collected by the DTRF NHS between September 2017 and August 2023 using the most recent survey submitted by participants, including clinical characteristics, treatment experience, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) data assessed by the GODDESS tool. Where applicable, continuous variables were assessed using descriptive statistics. Between-group proportions were compared using Pearson's chi-square test or Fisher's exact test. Analysis of variance was performed to assess the differences in mean time to diagnosis and mean scores of GODDESS Desmoid Tumor Symptom Scale (DTSS) and Desmoid Tumor Impact Scale (DTIS) domains and items across the subgroups of age, current tumor status, and tumor location where appropriate.
resultsSurveys were completed by 399 participants between September 2017 and August 2023. The median age of participants was 38 years; most were female (72%, 288/399), White (84%, 334/399), or resided in North America (86%, 345/399). Signs and symptoms reported at diagnosis included an unexplained bump (60%, 238/399), pain (57%, 226/399), and fatigue (14%, 54/399). A total of 162 participants (41%, 162/399) reported a prior misdiagnosis. Surgical procedures were the most common first-line therapy in those reporting multiple treatments for DT (59%, 74/126), followed by chemotherapy (24%, 30/126). Among 126 participants who reported a prior misdiagnosis and history of surgery for DT, 46% (58/126) reported having received surgery before a definitive DT diagnosis. For those undergoing surgery (any line) post-diagnosis, tumor recurrence was common (63%, 103/163). Participants with the presence of DT at survey completion reported significantly worse scores for pain, extra-abdominal symptoms, fatigue, physical functioning, and sleep in comparison to those without the current presence of a DT (P < 0.05).
conclusionsPatients with DT can experience a high disease burden. Misdiagnosis can lead to unnecessary surgery, potentially delaying an appropriate treatment for DT, and tumor regrowth that can contribute to impaired QoL after surgery. The analysis of NHS data presented in this manuscript highlights real-world experiences of patients with DT and underscores the need for patient-centric treatment strategies and outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.