ArticleBMC biology2025
Stronger reliance on visual perceptual history in individuals with higher math anxiety.
Article in BMC biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Serial dependence does not build up to central tendency bias in orientation judgments.Journal of vision · 2026Article
- Stronger reliance on visual perceptual history in individuals with higher math anxiety.BMC biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPerception is inferential, relying not only on current sensory input but also on prior knowledge. When sensory input is unreliable, history effects such as central tendency and serial dependence smooth out noise by combining previous and current stimuli. These processes support perceptual continuity but also introduce biases, making the current stimulus appear erroneously similar to the previous one. Despite being observed in many perceptual domains, the mechanisms underlying these dynamic processes remain debated. Although perceptual, cognitive, and developmental factors have been studied, the influence of psychological traits has received little attention. In this study, we compared serial dependence and central tendency effects measured with a visual numerosity task across individuals with different levels of math anxiety.
resultsWe found that individuals with higher math anxiety exhibited worse numerosity thresholds as well as stronger central tendency and serial dependence effects compared to those with lower math anxiety. Both effects were best explained by differences in participants' sensory thresholds and were unrelated to their visuo-spatial working memory, suggesting they mainly originate from perceptual uncertainty rather than memory span. Math anxiety, as measured by a questionnaire, demonstrated minimal predictive power in explaining history effects once sensory precision was accounted for. Finally, we found no correlation between serial dependence and central tendency effects, suggesting that they may rely on independent mechanisms.
conclusionsOverall, our study indicates that central tendency and serial dependence are distinct perceptual mechanisms, both amplified in individuals with reduced sensory precision linked to specific psychological traits, such as math anxiety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.