ArticleBMC nursing2025
Evaluation of psychological resilience and psychosocial care competencies of oncology nurses: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCancer causes psychological problems as well as physical health problems. Oncology nurses are charged with the identification and management of psychological problems, whilst continuing to provide care to cancer patients. Thus, this study was conducted to determine the level of psychosocial care competence and psychological resilience of oncology nurses in Türkiye and to evaluate the relationship between these two variables.
methodsThis descriptive and cross-sectional study study was conducted with 94 nurses who directly contacted and cared for cancer patients between 24.11.2024-12.01.2025. Data were collected using the Individual Introduction Form, Psychological Resilience Scale for Adults, and Psychosocial Care Competence Self-Assessment Scale. Frequency tables and descriptive statistics, Independent T test, One Way Anova test, Mann-Whitney U test and Kruskal-Wallis H test were used to analyse the data.
resultsThe mean scores obtained by the nurses for the Psychological Resilience Scale for Adults and the Psychosocial Care Competence Self-Assessment Scale were above average (121.73 ± 16.77 and 65.60 ± 17.40, respectively). The investigation revealed an absence of a substantial correlation between the scores attained on the Nurses' Psychological Resilience Scale for Adults and the Psychosocial Care Competence Self-Assessment Scale. Nurses' psychosocial care competence and psychological resilience scores were found to be independent of variables such as age, gender, education level, experience and workplace psychosocial.
conclusionIn this study, psychological resilience and psychosocial care competencies of oncology nurses in Türkiye were above average. There was no relationship between psychological resilience and psychosocial care competence of nurses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.