ArticleBMC cancer2025
Impact of timing of adjuvant chemotherapy initiation on survival for elderly patients with stage III colon cancer in Norway - a register-based cohort study.
Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundStandard treatment for stage III colon cancer is major surgical resection followed by adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT). Norwegian guidelines recommend initiation of ACT within 4–6 weeks after resection, but consensus regarding optimal timing of ACT is lacking.
objectiveTo investigate the impact of ACT timing on 5-year overall survival (OS) of elderly patients with stage III colon cancer in Norway.
methodsThis population-based retrospective cohort study included patients aged 70 years or older who underwent major surgical resection for stage III colon cancer diagnosed between 2011 and 2021. Patients were grouped by ACT timing after resection: ≤ 6, 7–8, 9–10, and 11–13 weeks, in addition to those with resection only. The 5-year OS was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards models.
resultsAmong 4 075 patients included, 1 408 were provided ACT. Median timing of ACT was 6.4 weeks after resection. Initiation of ACT in weeks 7–10 after resection was not associated with increased mortality risk compared to initiation within the first 6 weeks. Delaying the initiation of ACT beyond 10 weeks after resection was associated with worse 5-year OS (hazard ratio 1.49, 95% confidence interval 1.04–2.12). The association between survival benefit and ACT timing varied based on risk levels: For low risk patients, there was an association of improved survival benefit when ACT was initiated within 8 weeks after resection compared to resection alone, whereas for high risk patients, the association of survival benefit was better for those provided ACT in weeks 9–10 as well.
conclusionsOur findings support initiation of ACT within 8 weeks after major resection to maximise survival benefits in elderly patients with stage III colon cancer. However, for certain patient groups, initiation of ACT seems beneficial even up to 10 weeks after resection. The findings suggest greater flexibility in ACT initiation timing, benefiting both patients and health care services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.