Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41088081›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2025

Prediction of intraductal cancer microinfiltration based on the hierarchical fusion of peri-tumor imaging histology and dual view deep learning.

Guoyan Yao, Yan Huang, Xiaojing Shang, Lei Guo, Jieping Feng, Zhongqiu Lai, Weikang Huang, Jianye Lu, Lijun Chen, Minan Zheng

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Guoyan Yao *Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, 510120, China.
Yan Huang *Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, 510120, China.
Xiaojing Shang *Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, 510120, China.
Lei Guo *Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, 510120, China.
Jieping FengDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, 510120, China.
Zhongqiu LaiDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, 510120, China.
Weikang HuangDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, 510120, China.
Jianye LuDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, 510120, China.
Lijun ChenDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, 510120, China. ljchen_2009@163.com.
Minan ZhengDepartment of Emergency, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, 510120, China. zhengminan@yeah.net.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this study was to develop a multimodal fusion model for accurate risk prediction and clinical decision support for ductal carcinoma in-situ (DCIS).

methodBy integrating deep learning (DL), radiomics and clinical features, this study constructed the combined model and validated its performance in a multicenter cohort containing 232 patients (103 in the training set, 43 in the validation set and 86 in the external test set).

resultsUnimodal DL models showed significant overfitting in external tests (e.g., DenseNet201 training set AUC = 0.85 vs. test set 1 AUC = 0.47), whereas the multimodal fusion model achieved optimal predictive performance across cohorts through heterogeneous data synergy (training set AUC = 0.925, test set 2 AUC = 0.801) with the DeLong test confirmed that it significantly outperformed the unimodal model (P < 0.05). Grad-CAM visualization showed that the model focus region was highly consistent with the radiologist annotation (81% overlap, Cohen's κ = 0.68). Calibration curves (Hosmer-Leeshawn test P > 0.05) and decision curve analysis (DCA) validated the model prediction reliability (error < 5%) with a net clinical benefit advantage (net benefit difference of 7% to 28% at thresholds of 5% to 80%).

conclusionThe multimodal fusion strategy could potentially mitigate the limitations of unimodal models, presenting a potential solution with promising high accuracy and interpretability for individualized diagnosis and treatment of DCIS.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Intraductal, NoninfiltratingDeep LearningAgedFemaleHumansMiddle AgedClinical decision supportDeep learningDuctal carcinoma inside the ductMultimodal fusion modellingRadiomics

Identifiers

PMID41088081
PMCPMC12522707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.