ArticleBMC nursing2025
Barriers and facilitators to adherence to home-based pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a mixed-methods systematic review.
Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Pilot Feasibility Study of a Metronome-Cued mHealth System to Promote Walking Exercise in COPD.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Loneliness in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Multidimensional Determinant of Clinical Outcomes and Disease Management.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Global trends and research hotspots in pulmonary rehabilitation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a bibliometric analysis (2000-2024).Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- User personas for exercise rehabilitation behaviors in older patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a qualitative study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- The characteristics of people with COPD who enrol in home-based pulmonary rehabilitation versus centre-based pulmonary rehabilitation: A nationwide cross-sectional study.Chronic respiratory diseaseArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, and home-based pulmonary rehabilitation (HBPR) programs offer a promising non-pharmacological therapy. However, patient adherence to HBPR programs is far from satisfactory. This systematic review aims to synthesize existing evidence on the barriers and facilitators influencing adherence to HBPR programs in COPD patients from the perspective of healthcare professionals, family caregivers, and patients.
methodsA systematic review of quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods studies was undertaken using PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, and CINAHL. Two independent researchers applied the eligibility criteria and extracted the data onto a predetermined form. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool was applied to assess the methodological quality of eligible studies. The data were synthesized using a convergent integration approach and categorized according to the COM-B dimensions (i.e., capability, opportunity, and motivation) and participant types (i.e., healthcare professionals, family caregivers, and COPD patients).
resultsA total of 21 studies (9 qualitative, 8 quantitative, and 4 mixed-methods studies) were included, involving 1444 COPD patients, 153 healthcare professionals, and 17 family caregivers. A total of 76 barriers and 73 facilitators were identified and mapped onto the COM-B model. For COPD patients, the most frequent facilitators were self-management skills (capability), perceived support from healthcare professionals (opportunity), and positive attitudes (motivation). The most frequent barriers were poor use of technical equipment (capability), lack of resources (opportunity), and psychological tensions (motivation). For healthcare professionals, professional competence (capability) and attitudes towards HBPR programs (motivation) were the most common barriers and facilitators, respectively. In the opportunity dimension, resources and collaboration with healthcare professionals were the most common barriers and facilitators, respectively. There was no consistent barrier/facilitator category for family caregivers.
conclusionThe introduction of HBPR programs for COPD patients necessitates a tailored approach that considers the patient’s capability, opportunity, and motivation to improve adherence to HBPR programs. The active engagement of stakeholders is pivotal in guiding the evolution of interventions and ensuring effective clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.