Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41088073›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2025

The impact of Choosing Wisely

Aurélien Sallin, Daniel Ammann, Caroline Bähler, Tobias Müller, Stefan Neuner-Jehle, Oliver Senn, Eva Blozik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Aurélien SallinSWICA Health Services Research, Römerstrasse 37, Winterthur, 8401, Switzerland. aurelien.sallin@swica.ch.
Daniel AmmannBern University of Applied Sciences, Institute of Health Economics and Health Policy, Stadtbachstrasse 64, Bern, 3012, Switzerland.
Caroline BählerSWICA Health Services Research, Römerstrasse 37, Winterthur, 8401, Switzerland.
Tobias MüllerBern University of Applied Sciences, Institute of Health Economics and Health Policy, Stadtbachstrasse 64, Bern, 3012, Switzerland.
Stefan Neuner-JehleInstitute of Primary Care, University of Zurich and University Hospital Zurich, Pestalozzistrasse 24, Zürich, 8091, Switzerland.
Oliver SennInstitute of Primary Care, University of Zurich and University Hospital Zurich, Pestalozzistrasse 24, Zürich, 8091, Switzerland.
Eva BlozikSWICA Health Services Research, Römerstrasse 37, Winterthur, 8401, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInterventions to reduce low-value care vary considerably in effectiveness. International consensus considers vitamin D blood testing in a general population as a low-value care intervention, which lead to its inclusion in the Swiss Choosing WiselyTM recommendation in April 2021. In mid-2022, the Swiss Public Health authorities further restricted basic health insurance coverage for the test.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of health insurance claims data covering about 880’000 Swiss residents in the compulsory health insurance market. To assess the effects of a) the Choosing Wisely recommendation and b) the federal coverage restriction, we applied interrupted time series models at the physician level, controlling for seasonal effects, physician fixed effects, and patient characteristics.

resultsThe Choosing Wisely recommendation reduced the average monthly number of tests prescribed per physician per 100 consultations by approximately 5.98% in the 12 months following the intervention. The national coverage restriction led to a significant 57.82% drop in vitamin D testing per physician per 100 consultations in the 6 months following the intervention.

conclusionsMedical recommendations marginally reduced low-value services, and their impact on clinical practice was limited. In contrast, federal coverage restrictions drastically reduced unnecessary testing. Multicomponent strategies combining evidence-based guidance for healthcare professionals, patient involvement, and national regulation related to reimbursement could be a best practice model for guiding public health stakeholders and politicians in order to reduce low-value care.

Indexed as

Insurance CoverageLow-Value CarePractice Patterns, Physicians'Vitamin DFemaleHumansInterrupted Time Series AnalysisRetrospective StudiesSwitzerlandVitamin DChoosing wiselyClaims dataHealth policyLow-value careOveruseVitamin D blood testing

Identifiers

PMID41088073
PMCPMC12522628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.