ArticleBMC psychiatry2025
Prediction model for depression risk in middle-aged and elderly patients with metabolic syndrome: a nomogram and interpretable machine learning approach based on CHARLS.
Article in BMC psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Explainable Machine Learning Reveals Pattern-Specific Drivers of Depression in Middle-Aged and Older Adults with Multimorbidity: A Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study from CHARLS.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Construction of a prediction model for depression risk in elderly patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease based on machine learning algorithms and analysis of influencing factors.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Development of a machine learning-based screening model for the risk of depression among the elderly in China.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
- Association between the oxidative balance score and depressive symptoms in adults with metabolic syndrome: a cross-sectional study from NHANES.BMC psychiatry · 2026Article
- Identifying past-year self-reported suicidality in outpatients with somatic symptom disorder using an interpretable machine-learning model: a multicenter study with an online calculator.BMC psychiatry · 2026Observational
- Associations Between Depression Severity, Antidepressant Use, and Metabolic Syndrome Components Among Chinese Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study Based on Historical Medical Records.Actas espanolas de psiquiatria · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a nomogram model integrating noninvasive detection of radial pulse wave for predicting diabetic foot risk in type 2 diabetes mellitus.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIndividuals with metabolic syndrome (MetS) are more prone to depression, which is a significant complication impacting quality of life. This research seeks to create and validate predictive models for assessing depression risk in patients with MetS.
methodsData from the 2011 (baseline) and 2015 waves of the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS) were employed in this study. By excluding variables with more than 20% missing values, 38 features, such as demographic information, lifestyle factors, comorbidities, health status indicators, and blood test information, were included. The Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) identified 11 key contributors, and 6 machine learning (ML) models were employed to determine the best depression risk in patients with MetS. Furthermore, the 2015 CHARLS data were included as a temporal validation cohort.
resultsIn the 2011 CHARLS data, 5204 patients with MetS were analyzed, of whom 2543 (48.6%) exhibiting depression as indicated by a CESD-10 score of 10 or higher. 11 factors were selected to develop six ML models. The logistic regression (LR) (AUC: 0.749, 95% CI: 0.725-0.773) and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) (AUC: 0.749, 95% CI: 0.725-0.773) models showed the same predictive ability in the test set. Utilizing grid search optimization, the XGBoost model attained an AUC of 0.737 (95% CI: 0.714-0.760) on the validation set.
conclusionThe nomogram and SHAP visualization provide reliable tools for predicting depression in patients with MetS. The clinical utility of models applying LR and XGBoost is noteworthy, offering crucial insights for earlier detection and preventative actions for community staff and doctors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.