Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41088025›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2025

A Phase I open-label study to assess the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of capivasertib alone or in combination with paclitaxel in Chinese patients with advanced solid tumors.

Jian Zhang, Xiaojun Liu, Yiqun Du, Yuxin Mu, Yanchun Meng, Yan Sun, Ling Zhang, Chris Chen, Marie Cullberg, Ethan Fan and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04742036 (A Phase I Open-label Study to Assess the Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of Capivasertib Monotherapy and in Combination With Paclitaxel in Chinese Patients With Advanced Solid Tumours.), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04742036 phase1completednot on this map

A Phase I Open-label Study to Assess the Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of Capivasertib Monotherapy and in Combination With Paclitaxel in Chinese Patients With Advanced Solid Tumours.

TypeinterventionalSponsorAstraZenecaRan2021 to 2022Enrolled16ConditionsAdvanced Solid TumoursArmsCapivasertib, Paclitaxel
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jian ZhangShanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. syner2000@163.com.
Xiaojun LiuShanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Yiqun DuShanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Yuxin MuShanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Yanchun MengShanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Yan SunShanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Ling ZhangClinical Pharmacology, Development Science, AstraZeneca R&D, Shanghai, China.
Chris ChenOncology R&D, AstraZeneca, Shanghai, China.
Marie CullbergClinical Pharmacology & Quantitative Pharmacology, Biopharmaceuticals R&D, AstraZeneca, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Ethan FanOncology R&D, AstraZeneca, Shanghai, China.
Xichun HuShanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCapivasertib is recommended, plus fulvestrant, for hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer with PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN alterations and is under development for further breast and prostate cancer indications. Pharmacokinetics in Western and Japanese patients have been previously characterized. We conducted a Phase I trial assessing the pharmacokinetics and safety of capivasertib, alone or plus paclitaxel, in Chinese patients with advanced solid tumors.

methodsIn this open-label, fixed-sequence Phase I trial, Chinese patients with advanced solid tumors refractory or resistant to standard therapy received capivasertib alone (Part A) and then plus paclitaxel (Part B). The primary endpoint comprised capivasertib pharmacokinetics after a single dose (480 mg), or multiple doses given alone (480 mg twice daily [4 days on, 3 days off]) or plus paclitaxel (capivasertib 400 mg twice daily [4 days on, 3 days off], paclitaxel 80 mg/m

resultsOverall, 16 patients (median age 55.5 years, median weight 58.9 kg, 81.3% breast primary tumor location) received capivasertib alone in Part A and then capivasertib plus paclitaxel in Part B. The median time to maximum concentration, the geometric mean maximum plasma concentration, and the geometric mean area under the curve from time 0 to the last quantifiable concentration of capivasertib were: after a single dose (n = 16): 1.0 h, 1465 ng/mL, and 7243 h×ng/mL; after multiple doses (n = 15): 0.9 h, 2535 ng/mL, and 12,080 h×ng/mL; after multiple doses plus paclitaxel (n = 8): 1.9 h, 2467 ng/mL, and 12,830 h×ng/mL, respectively. After a single dose, the geometric mean terminal elimination half-life was 9.7 h. Hyperglycemia, diarrhea, and rash were the most common adverse events (reported for all patients). Most adverse events were Grade 1-2. Four (25.0%) patients achieved confirmed partial response and four (25.0%) stable disease as best objective response.

conclusionsConsistent with previous findings, capivasertib was absorbed rapidly and eliminated with a half-life of approximately 10 h. The manageable safety profile and preliminary antitumor activity support further investigation of capivasertib-containing combinations in Chinese patients with advanced solid tumors.

trial registrationThe trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with identifier no. NCT04742036. Date of registration: February 4, 2021.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsNeoplasmsPaclitaxelAdultAgedChinaEast Asian PeopleFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPyrimidinesPyrrolesTreatment OutcomecapivasertibPaclitaxelPyrimidinesPyrrolesCapivasertibChinesePaclitaxelPharmacokineticsPhase ISafety

Identifiers

PMID41088025
PMCPMC12519771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.