ArticleBMC cardiovascular disorders2025
Pulmonary arterial compliance as a long-term prognostic indicator in pulmonary arterial hypertension associated with adult congenital heart disease: results from a National multicenter prospective registry.
Article in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01417338 (National, Prospective, Multicenter,Observational Registry Study on Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension or Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension in China), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
National, Prospective, Multicenter,Observational Registry Study on Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension or Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension in China
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPulmonary arterial compliance (PAC) reflects the pulsatile load and predicts outcome in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). The prognostic role of PAC in the heterogeneous patient population of PAH associated with congenital heart disease (PAH-CHD) is poorly defined. This study aimed to explore the prognostic value of PAC in patients with PAH-CHD.
methodsAdult patients diagnosed with PAH-CHD were collected from a PAH multicenter prospective registry between August 2009 and December 2019. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. Multivariable Cox regression and restricted cubic spline (RCS) analysis were used to evaluate the association between PAC and the primary endpoint. Subgroup and interaction analysis between PAC and shunts or defect characteristics were explored. Incremental predictive performance was evaluated by calculating the C-index, continuous net reclassification improvement, and integrated discrimination improvement.
resultsA total of 434 adult PAH-CHD patients were enrolled. The median follow-up time was 52.2 months. The survival rate of patients in the lower PAC group was significantly worse than those in the higher PAC group (Log-rank P < 0.001). Multivariable Cox regression analysis showed that PAC independently predicted all-cause mortality after adjustment for other prognostic factors, whether as a continuous variable (HR = 0.665, 95%CI 0.503-0.878, P = 0.004) or a dichotomous variable (HR = 0.251, 95%CI 0.124-0.507, P < 0.001). A linear relationship between PAC and all-cause mortality was identified by RCS analysis. Subgroup analysis revealed that the impact of PAC might be affected by the presence of post-tricuspid shunt. Incorporating PAC into the validated risk models significantly improved the reclassification and discrimination ability for all-cause mortality.
conclusionPAC was significantly associated with all-cause mortality in patients with PAH-CHD and provided additional value on risk assessment. The role of PAC may vary across different clinical subgroups.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01417338), registered 16th August 2011.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.