SynthesisBMC infectious diseases2025
Potential biomarkers for tuberculous meningitis diagnosis using metabolomics and proteomics: a systematic review.
Synthesis in BMC infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Etiologic diagnosis of suspected tuberculous meningitis by multiplex PCR of cerebrospinal fluid.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2026Article
- Metabolic insights into the pathophysiology of tuberculous meningitis in FFPE postmortem human brain tissue.Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society · 2026Article
- Dynamics of IFN-γ, IL-2, and IL-6 during early tuberculosis treatment: significant longitudinal changes but limited value as standalone discriminators of treatment status.BMC microbiology · 2026Article
- Diagnosis of Tuberculous Meningitis: Integrating Clinical Assessment and Molecular Diagnostics.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Tuberculosis Diagnostic Methods: Clinical Applicability, Implementation Challenges, and Integrated Testing Strategies.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tuberculosis (TB) is the leading cause of death from a single infectious agent, with approximately 1.2 million deaths reported in 2023. While TB primarily affects the lungs, it can also spread to other organs, where it is classified as extrapulmonary TB. Tuberculous meningitis (TBM) is the most severe form of extrapulmonary TB, affecting 1–5% of TB cases. Delayed diagnosis contributes to its high mortality and severe neurological complications, with approximately 10% of affected individuals dying or suffering permanent neurological damage. When combined with adjunctive therapy, early detection and treatment can significantly improve survival outcomes. Currently, many studies have identified potential biomarkers of TBM; however, to date, there is no clear consensus on the markers altered in TBM. Hence, we conducted a systematic review aimed at identifying metabolites and proteins that are significantly altered in TBM when compared with healthy controls. Three databases — PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science — were scanned by two independent reviewers for potential articles that met our inclusion and exclusion criteria. After quality assessment, 17 studies were included, comprising a total of 963 participants (healthy control, n = 576; TBM, n = 387). Metabolites and proteins identified as being significantly altered across studies included alanine, isoleucine, myo-inositol, valine, arachidonate 5-lipoxygenase (ALOX5), apolipoprotein B (APOB), and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), which were detected in serum, urine, brain tissue, and cerebrospinal fluid samples. These markers have potential diagnostic value for TBM. However, further validation is needed to determine their specificity to reliably distinguish TBM from other neurological infections, which could improve early diagnosis and patient outcomes in TBM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.