ArticleBMC medical imaging2025
Differentiating triple-negative breast cancer and atypical fibroadenomas using an ultrasound-based radiomics nomogram.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Two-Dimensional Breast Ultrasound Radiomics: Implications for Lesion Characterization and Diagnostic Accuracy.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the application value of ultrasound radiomics technology in differentiating TNBC from atypical fibroadenoma (AFA) and to develop a nomogram model.
methodsIn this study, 75 patients with TNBC and 90 patients with AFA who underwent surgery were enrolled and randomly divided into training (n = 114) and validation cohorts (n = 51). Radiomic features were extracted from the images. LASSO regression analysis and stepwise regression were used for features selection. A prediction model was developed by combining multivariate logistic regression with the selected imaging biomarkers, resulting in the generation of a nomogram. A confusion matrix was used to visualize the distribution of correct and misclassified classifications. Finally, the validity of the model was assessed by using the receiver operator characteristic curve and calibration curve.
resultsMultivariate analysis based on ultrasound features identified elasticity score, fibrous strands within the mass and lateral acoustic shadow as independent factors for differentiating TNBC from AFA. The radiomics signature, composed of 4 selected features, achieved good diagnostic performance. The nomogram incorporating the radiomics signature demonstrated favorable diagnostic efficacy, and the AUC of the training set and the validation set were 0.977 and 0.982, which outperformed the ultrasound model (AUC = 0.939). The calibration curve demonstrated the good clinical utility of the radiomics nomogram.
conclusionThis study systematically analysed the ability of ultrasound radiomics to differentiate TNBC from AFA and the ultrasound-based radiomics nomogram effectively improved the diagnostic accuracy of TNBC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.